fetching data ...

AB0192 (2020)
RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: IS IT WORTH IT TO ADD LEFLUNOMIDE TO METHOTREXATE IN REFRACTORY DISEASE?
F. Guimarães1, D. Faria1, S. Azevedo1, J. Rodrigues1, J. Silva1, D. Almeida2, F. Teixeira1, C. Afonso1, D. Peixoto1, J. Tavares-Costa1
1Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Minho, Rheumatology, Ponte de Lima, Portugal
2Hospital de Braga, Rheumatology, Braga, Portugal

Background: In refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA), adding other classic synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) such as leflunomide (LFN) to methotrexate (MTX) is one suitable option [1,2]. Yet, there are safety issues to consider which may limit this strategy, but also regarding its true effectiveness in avoiding exposure to biological DMARDs (bDMARD) or target synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARD).


Objectives: To assess the effectiveness and safety of adding LFN to MTX and to evaluate the predictors of drug retention, toxicity and inefficacy.


Methods: A retrospective clinical record review of adult RA patients followed on our rheumatology department in whom LFN was added to MTX was done. Sociodemographic information, comorbidities, disease related information, adverse reactions and disease activity according to Disease Activity Score 28 – C reactive protein (DAS28) were recorded at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months of combination therapy (3_DAS28; 6_DAS28; 12_DAS28, respectively). Information regarding toxicity (need to dose adjustment/suspension) and inefficacy (add/switch to bDMARD/tsDMARD) were recorded. Follow-up was considered until last medical record available. SPSS was used for statistical analysis. Kaplan Meier and Cox-regression were used for univariate and multivariate analysis, respectively, significant level was 2-sided p <.05.


Results: In total, 77 patients were included, 66.20% females, with a mean age of 56±11 years old. There was a significant reduction of DAS28 only after 3 months of therapy (4.01±1.01 to 2.57±1.52, p =.003; ΔDAS28 = 1.58±1.17). However, during a median follow up time of 64 (IQR 39-83) months, 58.44% of patients needed to change treatment strategy, 66.67% due to toxicity (median time to toxicity 13 months, IQR 2-16) and 33.33% due to inefficacy (median time to inefficacy of 10 months, IQR 5.84-17.64). Gastrointestinal intolerance was the main reported toxicity (46.15%). In univariate analysis, anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) positivity, alcohol consumption, lack of comorbidities, hepatic toxicity, higher 6_DAS28, swollen joint count and tender joint count on the 6 th month were associated to lower retention rates.

In multivariate analysis, lack of comorbidities (HR=3.3, CI 95% 1.4-7.8, p =.006) and higher 6_DAS28 (HR=0.32, CI 95% 0.14-0.72, p =.006) were independent predictors of suspension of combination therapy. Moreover, both male gender (HR=2.87, 95%CI 1.2-6.56, p =.016) and positivity to ACPA (HR=0.1, 95%CI 0.01-0.73, p =.024) were independent predictors of toxicity. There was also higher tendency to toxicity, but without statistical significance, in alcohol consumers ( p =.08). Regarding inefficacy, smoking habits (HR=0.15, 95%CI 0.04-0.52) and 3_DAS28 (HR=0.15, 95%CI 0.04-0.53) were independent predictors.


Conclusion: Addition of LFN to MTX showed an early positive response. However, it was frequently associated to toxicity, and less than half of the patients continued with this therapeutic strategy after 5 years of follow up. Male gender, smoking habits and positivity to ACPA were predictors of worse outcome, as already reported in literature [1]. Lack of comorbidities was an independent predictor of suspension. This can be explained by the fact that physicians tend to adopt a more aggressive strategy on patients without comorbidities, switching earlier to bDMARDs/tsDMARDs.

This study also showed that early response to combination therapy is an independent predictor on drug retention, suggesting that decisions on treatment strategy should be made early after the beginning of MTX/LFN.


REFERENCES:

[1]Smolen JS, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;0:1–15. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216655

[2]Kremer J, et al. J Rheumatol. 2004 Aug;31(8):1521-31. PMID: 15290730


Disclosure of Interests: None declared


Citation: Ann Rheum Dis, volume 79, supplement 1, year 2020, page 1392
Session: Rheumatoid arthritis - prognosis, predictors and outcome (Abstracts Accepted for Publication)