fetching data ...

AB0296 (2020)
EFFECTIVENESS OF CERTOLIZUMAB IN 506 PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS, PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS, AND SPONDYLOARTHRITIS FROM THE APULIAN REGISTRY BIOPURE.
F. Iannone1, N. Maruotti2, A. Semeraro3, R. Bucci4, G. Carlino5, L. Santo6, L. Quarta7, C. Zuccaro8, G. Santacesaria9, M. Fornaro1, F. P. Cantatore2
1Rheumatology Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantations, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy
2Rheumatology Unit, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
3Rheumatology Unit, ASL Taranto, Martina Franca, Italy
4Rheumatology Hospital Unit, AOU Foggia, Foggia, Italy
5Rheumatology Service, ASL LE - DSS Casarano-Gallipoli (LE), Casarano, Italy
6Rheumatology Unit, ASL BT, Barletta, Italy
7Rheumatology Unit, “Vito Fazzi” Hospital, Lecce, Lecce, Italy
8Rheumatology Clinic, “Antonio Perrino” Hospital, Brindisi, Brindisi, Italy
9Rheumatology Service, ASL LE, Lecce, Italy

Background: Little is known about effectiveness of certolizumab (CTZ) in clinical practice, especially in patients with inadequate response to prior biologics.


Objectives: To estimate the survival rate of CTZ in RA, PsA or SpA cohorts from the registry BIOPURE. Secondary endpoint was the changes of clinical outcomes from baseline at 6 and 12 months for each disease.


Methods: We analyzed longitudinal data of consecutive patients, affected with RA, PsA or SpA starting a treatment with CTZ recorded into the web-based Apulian registry BIOPURE. Demographic and disease related characteristics were collected at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Drug survival was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier life table analysis. Estimates hazard ratios (HRs, 95% confidence intervals (CI)) of drug discontinuation adjusted for patient’s demographics, disease characteristics and prior biologic treatments were computed by Cox-regression models. Differences of DAS28, DAPSA and BASDAI among baseline, 6 and 12 months were estimated by T-test.


Results: 506 patients were included in this analysis ( table 1 ). Global mean survival time (95% CI) was 58 (52-64) months. Drug survival rate was significantly higher in RA (71.1%) than in PsA (63.5%, p=0.001), while SpA showed 67.5% ( Figure 1 ). Naïve-CTZ patients showed higher survival rates than biologic-inadequate responder (Bio-IR) patients in PsA (naïve 78.4% vs 56.9%, p=0.02), but not in RA (76.9% vs 64.1%, p=0.08), or SpA (73.7% vs 64.8%, p=0.84). The only weak predictor of drug discontinuation was age at baseline for SpA patients (HR 1.04 (95% CI:1.005-1.007) p=0.02) ( Figure 1 ). No baseline covariate, including sex, cDMARDs co-therapy and biologic-naïve status, was found to be associated with CTZ discontinuation for RA and PsA cohorts. A significant improvement of clinical outcomes from baseline was seen at 6 and 12 months, regardless prior biologic therapies. In RA DAS28 dropped from 3.95 ±1.5 to 2.77 ±1.3 at 6 months (p=0.0001) and 2.55 ±1.3 at 12 months (p= 0.0001). In PsA DAPSA decreased from 19.1 ±10 to 10.8 ±8 at 6 months (p=0.0001) and 9.6 ±7 at 12 months (p=0.0001). In SpA DAS28 reduced from 3.66 ±1.4 to 2.85 ±1.3 at 6 months (p=0.0001) and 2.55 ±1.1 at 12 months (p=0.0001). Additionally, in SpA BASDAI dropped from 5.3 ±1.6 to 3.8 ±2.3 at 6 months (p=0.0001) and 2.8 ±1.8 at 12 months (p=0.0001).


Conclusion: In real-life settings CTZ has shown a good effectiveness also in Bio-IR patients. Unlike other TNF-inhibitors, the clinical response and the survival rate were also meaningful in RA patients.


Table:
RA (nr. 180) PsA (nr.189) SpA (nr.137)
Age (mean ± SD) 54.5 ±12 50.6 ±12 52.0 ±11
Female 82.9 % 74.6 % 56.3 %
BMI (mean) 25.9 ± 5 28.4 ± 5 26.7 ± 5
Dis Durat months (mean ± SD) 46 ± 14 106 ± 82 97 ± 92
Naive 53.9 % 32.8 % 28.5 %
Prior biologics 52.9 % 75.0 % 71.1 %
Glucocorticoids 55.9 % 39.7 % 39.4 %
DMARDs 72.4 % 52.4 % 43.8 %
DAS28 (mean ± SD) 4.8 ± 1.5 3.6 ± 1.2 3.7 ± 1.3
BASDAI (mean ± SD) 5.2 ± 2
DAPSA (mean ± SD) 19.7 ±10
HAQ (mean ± SD) 1.2 ± 0.7 1.1 ± 0.6 1.2 ± 0.7
RF/ACPA + 72.4 %

Disclosure of Interests: Florenzo Iannone Consultant of: Speaker and consulting fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, MSD, Speakers bureau: Speaker and consulting fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, MSD, Nicola Maruotti Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Angelo Semeraro Speakers bureau: Sanofi, Roche, AbbVie, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Romano Bucci Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Sanofi, MSD, BMS, Giorgio Carlino Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Janssen, AbbVie, MSD, BMS., Leonardo Santo Consultant of: AbbVie, MSD, Novartis UCB outside this work, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, MSD, Novartis UCB outside this work, Laura Quarta: None declared, Carmelo Zuccaro Consultant of: MSD, AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, Janssen outside this work, Speakers bureau: MSD, AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, Janssen outside this work, Giuseppina Santacesaria: None declared, Marco Fornaro: None declared, Francesco Paolo Cantatore: None declared


Citation: Ann Rheum Dis, volume 79, supplement 1, year 2020, page 1443
Session: Rheumatoid arthritis - biological DMARDs (Abstracts Accepted for Publication)