fetching data ...

OP0109 (2020)
CO-MEDICATION WITH A CONVENTIONAL SYNTHETIC DMARD IN PATIENTS WITH AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS IS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPROVED RETENTION OF TNF INHIBITORS: RESULTS FROM THE EUROSPA COLLABORATION
M. Nissen1, B. Delcoigne1, D. DI Giuseppe1, L. T. H. Jacobsson1, K. Fagerli1, A. G. Loft1, A. Ciurea1, D. Nordström1, Z. Rotar1, F. Iannone1, M. J. Santos1, M. Pombo-Suarez1, B. Gudbjornsson1, H. Mann1, N. Akkoc1, C. Codreanu1, I. Van der Horst-Bruinsma1, B. Michelsen1, G. Macfarlane1, M. L. Hetland1, M. Tomsic1, B. Moeller1, P. Ávila-Ribeiro1, C. Sánchez-Piedra1, H. Relas1, A. J. Geirsson1, L. Nekvindova1, G. Yildirim Cetin1, R. Ionescu1, N. Steen Krogh1, J. Askling1, B. Glintborg1, U. Lindström1
1EuroSpA Research Collaboration, on behalf of the DANBIO (Denmark), ARTIS (Sweden), SCQM (Switzerland), NOR-DMARD (Norway), ATTRA (Czech Republic), Reuma.pt (Portugal), BIOBADASER (Spain), ROB-FIN (Finland), biorx.si (Slovenia), ICEBIO (Iceland), TURKBIO (Turkey), RRBR (Romania), ARC (Netherlands), BSRBR-AS (United Kingdom), GISEA (Italy), Copenhagen, Denmark

Background: Axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) patients treated with a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) may receive a concomitant conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (csDMARD), although the value of combination therapy remains unclear.


Objectives: Describe the proportion and phenotype of patients with axSpA initiating their first TNFi as monotherapy compared to TNFi+csDMARD combination therapy, and to compare the 1-year TNFi retention between the two groups.


Methods: Data from 13 European registries was collected. Two exposure treatment groups were defined: TNFi monotherapy at baseline (=TNFi start date) and TNFi+csDMARD combination therapy. TNFi retention rates were assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves for each country and combined. Hazard ratios (HR, 95% CI) for discontinuing the TNFi were obtained with Cox models: (i) crude; adjusted for (ii) country, and (iii) country, sex, age, calendar year, disease duration and BASDAI. Participating countries were dichotomized into two strata, depending on their 1-year retention rate being above (stratum A) or below (stratum B) the average retention rate across all countries.


Results: 22,196 axSpA patients were included with 34% on TNFi+csDMARD combination therapy. Baseline characteristics are presented in table 1 . Overall, the crude TNFi retention rate was marginally longer in the combination therapy group (80% (79-81%)) compared to the monotherapy group (78% (77-79%)) and was primarily driven by differences in stratum B ( fig. 1 ). TNFi retention rates varied significantly across countries (range:-11.0% to +11.3%), with a clear distinction between the 2 strata. The HRs for discontinuation over 1-year (reference=TNFi monotherapy) in the 3 models were: (i) 0.88 (0.82-0.93), (ii) 0.87 (0.82-0.92), (iii) 0.88 (0.82-0.93).

Baseline characteristics All patients (n=22196) Country stratum A Country stratum B
TNFi mono (n=4940) csDMARD + TNFi (n=2547) TNFi mono (n=9693) csDMARD + TNFi (n=5016)
Age (years), mean (SD) 42.6 (12.5) 43.4 (12.0) 42.8 (12.2) 41.6 (12.7) 43.7 (12.7)
Females, % 41.1 37.7 38.2 42.0 44.2
Disease duration (yrs), mean (SD) 5.7 (8.0) 6.2 (7.7) 6.7 (7.4) 4.9 (8.2) 6.1 (8.2)
Enthesitis, % 50.3 16.7 33.9 57.8 59.7
SJC-28, median (IQR) 0 (0-1) 0 (0-0) 0 (0-2) 0 (0-0) 0 (0-2)
VAS pain (0-100), mean (SD) 60.9 (24.5) 63.3 (26.5) 67.8 (23.3) 60.2 (23.4) 57.2 (24.3)
CRP (mg/L), median (IQR) 8 (3-20) 7.8 (2-20) 18 (6.7-32.6) 6.0 (2.7-15) 8.0 (3-22)
BASDAI (0-10), mean (SD) 5.7 (2.1) 5.7 (2.2) 6.2 (2.1) 5.6 (2.0) 5.4 (2.2)
BASFI (0-10), mean (SD) 4.4 (2.5) 4.4 (2.6) 4.9 (2.5) 4.3 (2.4) 4.2 (2.9)
ASDAS, mean (SD) 3.5 (1.1) 3.7 (1.0) 4.0 (1.0) 3.3 (1.0) 3.3 (1.1)
On Infliximab, % 25.7 21 22 24 36
Baseline csDMARD use, %
-Methotrexate 0 45 0 63
-Sulfasalazine 0 68 0 33
-Leflunomide 0 8 0 1

Conclusion: Considerable differences were observed across countries in the use of combination therapy and TNFi retention in axSpA patients. The overall 1-year TNFi retention was higher with csDMARD co-therapy compared to TNFi monotherapy. TNFi monotherapy had a 12-13% higher risk of treatment discontinuation.


Acknowledgments: Novartis Pharma AG and IQVIA

MN and BD participated equally


Disclosure of Interests: Michael Nissen Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Consultant of: Novartis, Lilly, Abbvie, Celgene and Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Novartis, Lilly, Abbvie, Celgene and Pfizer, Bénédicte Delcoigne: None declared, Daniela Di Giuseppe: None declared, Lennart T.H. Jacobsson Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis and Pfizer, Karen Fagerli: None declared, Anne Gitte Loft Grant/research support from: Novartis, Consultant of: AbbVie, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, Adrian Ciurea Consultant of: Consulting and/or speaking fees from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis and Pfizer., Dan Nordström Consultant of: Abbvie, Celgene, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB., Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Celgene, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB., Ziga Rotar Consultant of: Speaker and consulting fees from Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Medis, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi., Speakers bureau: Speaker and consulting fees from Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Medis, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi., Florenzo Iannone Consultant of: Speaker and consulting fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, MSD, Speakers bureau: Speaker and consulting fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, MSD, Maria Jose Santos Speakers bureau: Novartis and Pfizer, Manuel Pombo-Suarez Consultant of: Janssen, Lilly, MSD and Sanofi., Speakers bureau: Janssen, Lilly, MSD and Sanofi., Björn Gudbjornsson Speakers bureau: Novartis and Amgen, Heřman Mann: None declared, Nurullah Akkoc: None declared, Catalin Codreanu Consultant of: Speaker and consulting fees from AbbVie, Accord Healthcare, Alfasigma, Egis, Eli Lilly, Ewopharma, Genesis, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, UCB, Speakers bureau: Speaker and consulting fees from AbbVie, Accord Healthcare, Alfasigma, Egis, Eli Lilly, Ewopharma, Genesis, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, UCB, Irene van der Horst-Bruinsma Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Brigitte Michelsen: None declared, Gary Macfarlane: None declared, Merete L. Hetland Grant/research support from: BMS, MSD, AbbVie, Roche, Novartis, Biogen and Pfizer, Consultant of: Eli Lilly, Speakers bureau: Orion Pharma, Biogen, Pfizer, CellTrion, Merck and Samsung Bioepis, Matija Tomsic: None declared, Burkhard Moeller: None declared, Pedro Ávila-Ribeiro Grant/research support from: Novartis, Carlos Sánchez-Piedra: None declared, Heikki Relas Grant/research support from: Abbvie., Consultant of: Abbvie, Celgene, and Pfizer., Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Celgene, and Pfizer., Arni Jon Geirsson: None declared, Lucie Nekvindova: None declared, Gozde Yildirim Cetin Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, MSD, Ruxandra Ionescu Consultant of: Consulting fees from Abbvie, Eli-Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Speakers bureau: Consulting and speaker fees from Abbvie, Eli-Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Niels Steen Krogh: None declared, Johan Askling Grant/research support from: JA acts or has acted as PI for agreements between Karolinska Institutet and the following entities, mainly in the context of the ARTIS national safety monitoring programme of immunomodulators in rheumatology: Abbvie, BMS, Eli Lilly, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi, and UCB Pharma, Bente Glintborg Grant/research support from: Grants from Pfizer, Biogen and Abbvie, Ulf Lindström: None declared


Citation: Ann Rheum Dis, volume 79, supplement 1, year 2020, page 71
Session: Spondyloarthritis - treatment (Oral Presentations)