fetching data ...

SAT0128 (2020)
ARE THERE ANY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ADULT-ONSET RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS AND LATE-ONSET RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS IN TERMS OF USE OF BIOLOGICAL DRUGS AND DRUG RETENTION RATE? RESULTS FROM THE TURKBIO REGISTRY
A. Yazici1, A. Cefle1, E. Dalkiliç2, G. Can3, S. Senel4, S. S. Koca5, N. Inanc6, B. Goker7, S. Yilmaz8, S. Akar9, O. Soysal10, Y. Pehlivan2, M. A. Ozturk7, İ. Sari3, H. Direskeneli6, F. Onen3
1Kocaeli School of Medicine, Rheumatology, Kocaeli, Turkey
2Uludag School of Medicine, Rheumatology, Bursa, Turkey
3Dokuz Eylul School of Medicine, Rheumatology, Izmir, Turkey
4Erciyes School of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey
5Firat School of Medicine, Rheumatology, Elazig, Turkey
6Marmara School of Medicine, Rheumatology, Istanbul, Turkey
7Gazi School of Medicine, Rheumatology, Ankara, Turkey
8Selçuk School of Medicine, Rheumatology, Konya, Turkey
9Katip Celebi School of Medicine, Rheumatology, Izmir, Turkey
10Celal Bayar School of Medicine, Rheumatology, Manisa, Turkey

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis(RA) is one of the most frequent rheumatic disease, and the age of onset is between 30-50 years old. Late-onset RA(LORA) is usually defined as RA with onset at age 60 or over.


Objectives: To investigate the choice, effectiveness and the retention rate of biological drugs in LORA patients.


Methods: TURKBIO registry is the Turkish version of Danish DANBIO rheumatological database which has been established in 2011. We studied RA patients in TURKBIO registry cohort between the dates of 2011 and 2020. All patients fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA and were classified into two groups based on their age at symptom onset: adult-onset RA(>18-<60 years; AORA) and LORA(≥60 years). In both groups, demographical, clinical and laboratory variables; disease activity, current and previous treatment were compared.


Results: From 10 centers, 2111 RA patients recruited, and 8.8% of them was LORA patients. In LORA, the frequency of female was less than AORA. While, there was no difference between LORA and AORA in terms of erosion presence and RF positivity, antiCCP positivity was more frequent in LORA group. The use of antiTNF was lower, and the use of rituximab was more frequent in LORA. At 12 months after bDMARDs therapy, serum CRP and ESR levels and DAS28-CRP showed higher changes compared to baseline values in LORA. Although the mortality rate was higher in LORA, the adverse reactions were reported to be higher in AORA, and most common advers reaction was infections in both groups(Table). The longest survival was observed in infliximab and rituximab(median 22 and 20months) in LORA, in rituximab and golimumab(median 16 and 12months) in AORA.


Conclusion: The frequency of LORA who uses bDMARDs was 8.8% in our database. In the elderly patient population, there are some reservations about the use of biological drugs in general due to several co-morbidities and concommitant drug used. Although data on this issue are limited, appropriate biological use can be effective and reliable in required patients.


REFERENCES:

[1]Zulfigar AA, Niazi R, Pennaforte JL, Andres E. Late-onset rheumatoid arthritis: clinical, biyological, and therapeutic features about a retrospecttive study. Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Viell 2019;17:51-62

Comparison of demographic, laboratory findings and biologicaltreatment

(median;25-75) n(%) AORA (<60) (n:1925) LORA (≥60) (n:186) p
Age (year) 54 (43-61) 71 (68-74) <0.001
Disease duration (year) 11.4 (7-18) 6 (4-9) <0.001
Gender (Female) 1562 (81) 124 (67) <0.001
Anti-CCP positivity 747 (62) 65 (72) 0.044
RF positivity 721 (61) 63 (70) 0.085
Erosion presence 486 (56) 41 (62) 0.955
Drug survival (months) 18 (6-44) 18 (4-31) 0.046
Concomitant csDMARDs
MTX 629 (34) 39 (22) 0.001
SZP 146 (8) 13 (7) 0.781
LEF 501 (27) 35 (20) 0.032
bDMARDs
AntiTNF 1068 (56) 73 (39) <0,001
TCZ 304 (16) 20 (11) 0,069
TOFA 294 (15) 27 (15) 0,784
RTX 439 (23) 57 (31) 0,016
ABA 298 (16) 34 (18) 0,317
Response ΔESH -6 (-21-4) -18 (-36--3) 0.016
(12 months) ΔCRP -2 (-12-0.6) -9.3 (-28--0.1) 0.014
ΔDAS28-CRP -1.3 (-3--0.1) -2.2 (-3--1) 0.023
ΔHAQ -0.3 (-0.8-0) -0.4 (-0.8--0.1) 0.114
Adverse effects 440 (23) 32 (17) 0.077
Malignancy 9 (0,5) 3 (1.6) 0.082
Infection 192 (10) 10 (5) 0.042
Allergy 63 (3) 4 (2) 0.404
Dermatitis 62 (3) 1 (0,5) 0.040
Death 18 (0.9) 7 (4) 0.004
Other 136 (7) 11 (6) 0.556

Acknowledgments : None


Disclosure of Interests : None declared


Citation: Ann Rheum Dis, volume 79, supplement 1, year 2020, page 996
Session: Rheumatoid arthritis - biological DMARDs (Poster Presentations)