fetching data ...

THU0328 (2020)
SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF SUBCUTANEOUS TOCILIZUMAB IN SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS: RESULTS FROM THE OPEN-LABEL PERIOD OF THE PHASE 3 FOCUSSCED TRIAL
D. Khanna1, C. J. F. Lin2, H. Spotswood3, J. Siegel2, D. Furst4, C. Denton5
1University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States of America
2Genentech, South San Francisco, United States of America
3Roche Products Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom
4University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States of America
5University College London, London, United Kingdom

Background: The anti–interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor-α antibody tocilizumab (TCZ) demonstrated skin score improvement and forced vital capacity (FVC) preservation in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) in a phase 2 randomized controlled trial. 1,2 Data from the 48-week, double-blind (DB), placebo (PBO)-controlled period of the focuSSced phase 3 trial were previously presented, 3 and open-label (OL) data up to week 96 are presented herein.


Objectives: To assess the long-term safety and efficacy of TCZ in SSc patients.


Methods: Adult patients with active SSc (≤60-month duration, modified Rodnan skin score [mRSS] 10-35, and elevated acute-phase reactants) treated with PBO or TCZ in the DB period received OL TCZ 162 mg SC weekly from weeks 48 to 96 in the OL period (PBO→OL TCZ and TCZ→OL TCZ, respectively). Exploratory analysis of data up to week 96 included no formal statistical analyses. Changes in mRSS and percent predicted FVC (ppFVC) were assessed.


Results: Overall, 92/105 TCZ (88%) and 89/107 PBO (83%) patients entered the OL TCZ treatment period at week 48, and 85/105 TCZ→OL TCZ (81%) and 82/107 PBO→OL TCZ (77%) patients completed treatment up to week 96. Continued decline in mRSS was observed in the OL period for PBO→OL TCZ and TCZ→OL TCZ patients (Table). Change in ppFVC for patients who switched from PBO to TCZ (PBO→OL TCZ) was comparable between weeks 48 and 96 (OL period) to the change in patients who received TCZ from BL to week 48 in the DB period (Table). Rates (95% CI) of serious adverse events from weeks 48 to 96 were 15.8 (8.6, 26.5) per 100 PY for TCZ→OL TCZ patients, 14.8 (7.9, 25.3) per 100 PY for PBO→OL TCZ patients, and 15.4 (11.0, 20.9) for all TCZ exposure over 96 weeks (n = 193). Rates (95% CI) of serious infections were 2.3 (0.3, 8.1) per 100 PY for TCZ→OL TCZ patients, 3.4 (0.7, 10.0) per 100 PY for PBO→OL TCZ patients, and 3.0 (1.3, 5.9) for all TCZ exposure over 96 weeks. One death occurred during the OL period in each arm.


Conclusion: Although OL data have to be interpreted with caution, results from OL TCZ treatment show numeric improvements in mRSS and FVC preservation similar to those of the DB period, with a beneficial effect on trajectory of FVC decline in patients who switched from PBO to TCZ. Long-term safety results were consistent with the known safety profile of TCZ, and no new or unexpected events were observed.


REFERENCES:

[1]Khanna D et al. Lancet 2016;387:2630-40.

[2]Khanna D et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:212-20.

[3]Khanna D et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2018;70(suppl 10):abst 898.

Change in Efficacy From Baseline

Baseline to Week 48 Baseline to Week 96 Week 48 to Week 96
PBO TCZ PBO→OL TCZ TCZ→OL TCZ PBO→OL TCZ TCZ→OL TCZ
mRSS, mean (95% CI) a –5.3 (–6.9, –3.7) n = 92 –6.7 (–8.0, –5.4) n = 97 –8.4 (–10.0, –6.8) n = 83 –9.6 (–10.9, –8.4) n = 85 –2.5 (–3.3, –1.6) n = 82 –2.3 (–3.2, –1.5) n = 85
ppFVC, mean (95% CI) [median] –4.1 (–5.8, –2.4) [–3.9] n = 92 –0.2 (–1.6, 1.2) [–0.7] n = 94 –3.3 (–5.1, –1.5) [–3.1] n = 79 –0.5 (–2.4, 1.3) [–1.4] n = 84 0.6 (–0.7, 1.9) [0.3] n = 78 –0.3 (–1.7, 1.1) [0.0] n = 82
Decline in ppFVC ≥10%, n/N (%) a 15/91 (16.5) 5/93 (5.4) 14/79 (17.7) 11/84 (13.1) NA NA
Improvement in ppFVC, n/N (%) a 26/91 (28.6) 43/93 (46.2) 22/79 (27.8) 35/84 (41.7) NA NA

a Observed data. NA, not assessed.


Disclosure of Interests: Dinesh Khanna Shareholder of: Eicos, Grant/research support from: NIH NIAID, NIH NIAMS, Consultant of: Acceleron, Actelion, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Corbus, Galapagos, Genentech/Roche, GSK, Mitsubishi Tanabi, Sanofi-Aventis/Genzyme, UCB Pharma, Celia J. F. Lin Employee of: Genentech, Helen Spotswood Shareholder of: Roche Products Ltd, Employee of: Roche Products Ltd, Jeff Siegel Employee of: Genentech, Daniel Furst Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, BMS, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, the National Institutes of Health, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche/Genentech, Consultant of: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, BMS, Cytori Therapeutics, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, the National Institutes of Health, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche/Genentech, Speakers bureau: CMC Connect (McCann Health Company), Christopher Denton Grant/research support from: GlaxoSmithKline, CSL Behring, and Inventiva, Consultant of: Medscape, Roche-Genentech, Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Aventis, Inventiva, CSL Behring, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Acceleron, Curzion and Bayer


Citation: Ann Rheum Dis, volume 79, supplement 1, year 2020, page 390
Session: Scleroderma, myositis and related syndromes (Poster Presentations)