fetching data ...

AB0525 (2021)
GUSELKUMAB TREATMENT SHOWS RAPID ONSET OF EFFECT ON COMPONENTS OF AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RHEUMATOLOGY RESPONSE CRITERIA: RESULTS OF 2 RANDOMIZED PHASE 3 TRIALS
P. Nash1, I. McInnes2, C. T. Ritchlin3, W. C. Tsai4, Y. Y. Leung5, L. S. Tam6, D. Furtner7, M. Shawi8, S. Xu9, S. Sheng9, A. Kollmeier10, A. Deodhar11
1Griffiths University and University of Queensland, Rheumatology Research Unit, Maroochydore, Australia
2University of Glasgow, Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Glasgow, United Kingdom
3University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Allergy/Immunology and Rheumatology, Rochester, United States of America
4Kaohsiung Medical University, Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, Republic of China
5Singapore General Hospital, Duke -NUS Medical School, Rheumatology & Immunology, Singapore, Singapore
6The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, Shatin, Hong Kong (SAR)
7Janssen, a division of Johnson & Johnson Pte. Ltd, Immunology, Singapore, Singapore
8Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Immunology, Spring House, United States of America
9Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Biostatistics, Spring House, PA, United States of America
10Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Immunology, San Diego, CA, United States of America
11Oregon Health & Science University, Division of Arthritis & Rheumatic Diseases, Oregon, United States of America

Background: Guselkumab (GUS), an anti-interleukin-23p19-subunit monoclonal antibody, demonstrated efficacy vs placebo (PBO) in achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) response in patients (pts) with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in two phase 3 trials, DISCOVER-1 & 2. 1,2


Objectives: To assess the differential treatment effects of GUS across individual components of ACR response in PsA pts participating in the DISCOVER-1 & 2 trials.


Methods: In DISCOVER-1 & 2, 1120 pts were randomized & treated with GUS 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W; N=373); GUS 100 mg at Week (W)0 and W4, then Q8W (N=375); or matching PBO (N=372). Pts were evaluated by independent joint assessors at study visits. ACR20 response is defined as ≥20% improvement from baseline in both tender joint count (0-68 [TJC68]) and swollen joint count (0-66 [SJC66]) and ≥20% improvement from baseline in ≥3 of 5 assessments: Patient Assessment of Pain [Pt Pain], Patient Assessment of Global Disease Activity (arthritis) [PtGA], Physician Assessment of Global Disease Activity [PGA], Patient assessment of physical function as measured by Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI), and C-reactive protein (CRP). For each ACR component, achievement of ≥20% improvement from baseline was assessed over time through W24 for the combined (Q4W+Q8W) GUS groups, and median time to onset of treatment effect was determined with Kaplan-Meier curves by randomized group.


Results: Median time to response for all components except SJC66 occurred earlier with GUS than PBO. Time to onset of ACR20 treatment effect is shown in Figure 1 . CRP data show 56% of GUS-treated pts had diminution of systemic inflammation by W4 ( Table 1 ). Reduction in systemic inflammation was accompanied or rapidly followed by GUS-related improvement in both PtGA and PGA (median W4-8). Although SJC66/TJC68 data showed similar patterns, there was also a high PBO response (data not shown). Consistent with early reductions in systemic inflammation, 48-61% of GUS-treated pts had ≥20% improvement in TJC68/SJC66/PGA at W4 ( Table 1 ), and 45-48% had ≥20% improvement in HAQ-DI, PtGA, and Pt Pain by W8. By W24, >80% of GUS-treated pts had ≥20% improvement in SJC66/TJC68/PGA, followed by 63-64% with this degree of improvement in PtGA, CRP, and Pt Pain, and 57% for HAQ-DI.


Conclusion: GUS demonstrated ACR20 improvements with separation from PBO in ACR components as early as W4, which is consistent with reduced inflammation by GUS and prior serological studies. 3 At early study time points, both pts and physicians were able to discern improvements in signs and symptoms of arthritis that rapidly followed reductions in systemic inflammation (CRP). The predominant drivers of ACR20 response rates at W24 in GUS pts were SJC66/TJC68/PGA.


REFERENCES:

[1]Deodhar A et al. Lancet. 2020;395:1115-25

[2]Mease P et al. Lancet. 2020;395:1126-36

[3]Siebert S et al. EULAR 2020. Presentation OP0229

W4 W8 W12 W16 W20 W24
ACR20 20 39 50 56 60 61
HAQ-DI score 36 45 52 54 56 57
SJC66 61 74 84 86 87 88
TJC68 48 65 75 79 80 81
PGA 50 67 74 78 81 81
PtGA 35 48 58 59 62 64
Pt Pain 32 48 55 58 61 63
CRP 56 60 62 63 64 64

Disclosure of Interests: Peter Nash Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer, Celgene, Gilead, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sun, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer, Celgene, Gilead, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sun, Iain McInnes Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, and UCB, Christopher T. Ritchlin Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, and UCB, Wen-Chan Tsai Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer, and Novartis, Ying Ying Leung Consultant of: Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, and Novartis, Lai-Shan Tam Consultant of: AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, and Sanofi, Grant/research support from: Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, GSK, Novartis, and Pfizer, Daniel Furtner Employee of: Janssen, a division of Johnson & Johnson Pte. Ltd., May Shawi Employee of: Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Stephen Xu Employee of: Janssen Research and Development LLC, Shihong Sheng Employee of: Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Alexa Kollmeier Employee of: Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Atul Deodhar Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB.


Citation: Ann Rheum Dis, volume 80, supplement 1, year 2021, page 1290
Session: Psoriatic arthritis – treatment (Publication Only)