fetching data ...

AB0526 (2021)
SUSTAINED GUSELKUMAB RESPONSE IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS REGARDLESS OF BASELINE DEMOGRAPHIC AND DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: POOLED RESULTS THROUGH WEEK 52 OF TWO PHASE 3, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDIES
C. T. Ritchlin1, P. J. Mease2, W. H. Boehncke3, J. Tesser4, E. Schiopu5, S. D. Chakravarty6,7, A. Kollmeier8, E. C. Hsia8,9, X. L. Xu8, M. Shawi10, Y. Jiang11, S. Sheng11, J. F. Merola12, I. McInnes13, A. Deodhar14
1University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, Department of Medicine - Allergy/Immunology and Rheumatology, Rochester, United States of America
2Swedish Medical Center/Providence St. Joseph Health and University of Washington, Rheumatology Research, Seattle, United States of America
3Geneva University Hospitals, Dermatology, Geneva, Switzerland
4Arizona Arthritis and Rheumatology Associates, Rheumatology, Phoenix, United States of America
5Michigan Medicine Rheumatology Clinic, Rheumatology & Internal Medicine, Ann Arbor, United States of America
6Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Immunology, Horsham, United States of America
7Drexel University College of Medicine, Rheumatology, Philadelphia, United States of America
8Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Immunology, Spring House, United States of America
9University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Rheumatology, Philadelphia, United States of America
10Janssen Global Services, LLC, Immunology, Horsham, United States of America
11Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Biostatistics, Spring House, United States of America
12Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Department of Dermatology, and Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Boston, United States of America
13University of Glasgow, Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Glasgow, United Kingdom
14Oregon Health & Science University, Division of Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases, Portland, United States of America

Background: In the Phase 3 DISCOVER-1 1 & DISCOVER-2 2 trials, guselkumab (GUS), a human monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-23p19-subunit, was effective in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) across joint & skin endpoints. At Week 24 (W24), GUS benefit was consistent regardless of baseline (BL) demographic & disease characteristics. 3


Objectives: We assessed whether GUS efficacy was sustained through W52 in pooled DISCOVER-1 & -2 patients (pts) across select BL subgroups.


Methods: Adults with active PsA despite standard therapies were enrolled in DISCOVER-1 (swollen [SJC] ≥3 & tender joint count [TJC] ≥3, C-reactive protein [CRP] ≥0.3 mg/dL) & DISCOVER-2 (SJC ≥5 & TJC ≥5, CRP ≥0.6 mg/dL). 31% of DISCOVER-1 pts had received 1-2 prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitors; DISCOVER-2 pts were biologic naïve. Pts were randomized 1:1:1 to GUS 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); GUS 100 mg at W0, W4, then Q8W; or placebo (PBO). Pts randomized to PBO received GUS 100 mg Q4W starting at W24 & were excluded from these analyses assessing maintenance of effect from W24 to W52. GUS effects on joint (American College of Rheumatology [ACR]20/50/70) & skin (Investigator’s Global Assessment [IGA=0/1 + ≥2-grade reduction from W0] in pts with ≥3% body surface area [BSA] with psoriasis & IGA ≥2 at W0) endpoints were evaluated by pt BL SJC, TJC, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) use, body mass index (BMI), PsA duration, & % BSA with psoriasis. Missing data were imputed as nonresponse through W52.


Results: BL pt characteristics in DISCOVER-1 (N=381) & DISCOVER-2 (N=739) were well balanced across randomized groups. 1,2 Among 1120 pooled pts, mean SJC was 11, mean TJC was 21, & 68% used csDMARDs (primarily methotrexate [MTX]). At W24, 62% (232/373) & 60% (225/375), respectively, of GUS Q4W- & Q8W-treated pts achieved ACR20 vs 29% (109/372) of PBO, with GUS effect consistently observed across pt BL subgroups ( Figure 1 ). ACR20 response rates were sustained or increased at W52 in the GUS Q4W (72%) & Q8W (70%) groups & across SJC (61-79%), TJC (68-76%), & csDMARD use (68-80%) subgroups ( Table 1 ) & pt subgroups defined by BL BMI, PsA duration, & % BSA with psoriasis (data not shown). ACR50 & 70 response patterns were similar to ACR20 ( Table 1 ). In pts with ≥3% BSA psoriasis & IGA ≥2 at BL, 71% (193/273) & 66% (171/258) of GUS Q4W- & Q8W-treated pts, respectively, vs 18% (47/261) of PBO, achieved IGA 0/1 at W24, with GUS effect consistently observed across pt BL subgroups ( Figure 1 ). IGA 0/1 response rates were also sustained or increased at W52 in the GUS Q4W (80%) & Q8W (71%) groups & across % BSA with psoriasis (67-87%) & csDMARD use (68-87%) subgroups ( Table 1 ) & pt subgroups defined by BL BMI and PsA duration (data not shown).


Conclusion: Treatment with GUS 100 mg Q4W & Q8W resulted in sustained improvement in signs & symptoms of active PsA through W52 regardless of pt BL characteristics.


REFERENCES:

[1]Deodhar A, et al. Lancet 2020;395:1115-25;

[2]Mease P, et al. Lancet 2020;395:1126-36;

[3]Deodhar A, et al. American College of Rheumatology 2020; Poster P0908.

Figure 1

ACR & IGA Responses at Weeks 24 & 52 & by Select BL Characteristics

Guselkumab Q4W Guselkumab Q8W
N=373 N=375
Week 24 Week 52 Week 24 Week 52
ACR20, % 62 72 60 70
 SJC (<10/10-15/>15) 68/59/53 79/61/67 57/66/60 68/68/76
 TJC (<10/10-15/>15) 74/67/56 73/76/69 62/60/60 75/68/68
 csDMARD use (none/any/MTX) 66/60/63 80/68/68 62/59/57 73/68/68
ACR50, % 34 49 31 45
 SJC (<10/10-15/>15) 41/32/20 58/39/38 34/28/26 46/40/49
 TJC (<10/10-15/>15) 51/41/24 58/53/43 40/33/26 52/46/43
 csDMARD use (none/any/MTX) 36/33/35 53/46/48 36/29/27 51/42/40
ACR70, % 16 27 16 27
 SJC (<10/10-15/>15) 22/10/7 32/20/24 18/10/19 30/23/26
 TJC (<10/10-15/>15) 29/19/9 34/32/22 27/15/14 35/28/24
 csDMARD use (none/any/MTX) 21/13/14 30/26/27 21/14/14 34/24/23
N=273 N=258
IGA 0/1, % 71 80 66 71
 BSA % with psoriasis (≥3-<10/≥10-<20/≥20) 61/71/80 76/87/79 62/64/72 67/72/74
 csDMARD use (none/any/MTX) 84/64/67 87/77/78 72/63/64 77/68/68

Disclosure of Interests: Christopher T. Ritchlin Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Gilead, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, and UCB Pharma, Philip J Mease Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN, and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN, and UCB Pharma, Wolf-Henning Boehncke Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Almirall, Celgene, Janssen, Leo, Eli Lilly, Novartis, UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Almirall, Celgene, Janssen, Leo, Eli Lilly, Novartis, UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, John Tesser Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Crescendo Biosciences/Myriad, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Janssen, Eli Lilly, and Pfizer, Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and Pfizer, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Horizon, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Merck KG, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sun Pharma, Setpoint, and UCB Pharma, Elena Schiopu Consultant of: Janssen, Grant/research support from: Janssen, Soumya D Chakravarty Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, of which Janssen Research & Development is a wholly owned subsidiary, Employee of: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Alexa Kollmeier Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, of which Janssen Research & Development is a wholly owned subsidiary, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Elizabeth C Hsia Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, of which Janssen Research & Development is a wholly owned subsidiary, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Xie L Xu Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, of which Janssen Research & Development is a wholly owned subsidiary, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, May Shawi Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, of which Janssen Research & Development is a wholly owned subsidiary, Employee of: Janssen Global Services, LLC, Yusang Jiang Employee of: Cytel, Inc., providing statistical support (funded by Janssen), Shihong Sheng Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, of which Janssen Research & Development is a wholly owned subsidiary, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Joseph F. Merola Consultant of: AbbVie, Arena, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, and UCB Pharma, Iain McInnes Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, and UCB Pharma, Atul Deodhar Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma.


Citation: Ann Rheum Dis, volume 80, supplement 1, year 2021, page 1291
Session: Psoriatic arthritis – treatment (Publication Only)