Background: The recent widespread switching of patients with inflammatory rheumatic conditions from originators to biosimilars has largely been driven by costs. The views of patients on switching are also important in the successful long term switching to biosimilars. We conducted a survey of patients views on patients satisfaction with the switch to biosimilar therapy.

Objectives: To assess satisfaction and response after switching from originator (Humira or Enbrel) to biosimilar (Amgevita or Benepali respectively), and to describe efficacy, side effects and reactions to biosimilar.

Methods: All patients diagnosed with an inflammatory arthritis and switched to biosimilar were identified using the Irish national HighTech electronic prescriptions system. Participants had been administered the biosimilar for > 3 months and were invited to take part via a telephone survey. This consisted of 4 questions (Question 1: satisfaction with the response to the new medication [Using 5 point Likert scale = 0: very dissatisfied; 1: dissatisfied; 2: neutral; 3 satisfied;4: very satisfied]; Question 2: overall satisfaction with biosimilar compared to originator if originator was 10 [satisfaction rating from 1 – 10 scale: 1,2: very dissatisfied; 3,4: dissatisfied; 5: neutral; 6,7,8: satisfied; 9,10: very satisfied]]; Question 3: adverse effects with biosimilars; Question 4: opinion on usage of new device [0: very difficult; 1: difficult; 2: same as previous device; 3: improvement compare to previous device).

Results: Baseline characteristics of biosimilar switch patients with disease category were:

The majority of the patients had positive view towards the effectiveness of the biosimilar: 36% very satisfied; 28% satisfied; 13% neutral; 10% dissatisfied; 13% very dissatisfied.

45% of the patients gave score of 9 and 10 in the survey of overall satisfaction to biosimilar if originator was given a score of 10, followed by 32% of them gave a score from 6 to 8, 4% of the patients gave a score of 5 and 7% of them gave a score of 3 and 4. The rest of them gave a score of 1 and 2.

12 participants switched back to originator (Humira, n=5; Enbrel, n=7) for the reasons of unable to use the device, anxiety, hemoptysis, nose bleeding, tongue swelling, neck pain, lethargy and generalized itchiness.

The most common complaints were (12 patients) systemic side effects (tiredness, headache, nausea, skin rashes, hair loss, muscle ache, tongue swelling, mood swing, dizzy, nose bleed, erectile dysfunction, hypertension, hemoptysis and red sclera).

17% of the patients find the biosimilars device easier to use compare to originator and 55% of the patients find both device are similar. 24% and 4% of them find the new device is difficult to very difficult to use respectively.

Conclusion: 69% of patients from Amgevita group and 60% of patients from Benepali group were satisfied with the change. Only 28% of the patients found the new device difficult to use. Overall conclusion from the study showed less than one quarter of the participants showed dissatifaction towards biosimilar and less than 12 % experienced systemic side effects and whether biosimilar could be a next cost effective biologic therapy to replace originator in future requires a longer duration of study.

Disclosure of Interests: None declared