Background: Juvenile Localized Scleroderma (jLS) is a rare pediatric inflammatory disease of skin and underlying tissues that may cause significant functional impairment and disfigurement. Management approaches vary and an optimum treatment regimen is lacking. In 2012, a group of jLS researchers of Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) proposed consensus treatment plans (CTPs), aimed to streamline the approach to care for jLS patients.
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate a large jLS patient cohort seen over a 21-year period in a single tertiary care pediatric hospital in the USA, in order to examine treatments utilized and determine parameters for systemic therapy initiation.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included jLS patients with disease onset in childhood (≤18-years of age) who were seen in rheumatology, dermatology, or combined rheumatology-dermatology clinics from 1999-2020, with ≤ 3 years of follow-up. Data on demographics, disease characteristics, therapies prescribed, and treatment trends were analyzed.
Results: Of the 270 jLS patients identified, 101 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The primary reason for exclusion was <3 years of follow-up. Selected demographic data and disease characteristics of patients are shown in
Demographic and Disease Characteristics
All Patients
| On Systemic Therapy
| No Systemic Therapy
| p value | |
Age-onset (Y), median (IQR) | 7.5 (6.4) | 9 (6) | 7 (4) | NS |
Age-diagnosis(Y), median (IQR) | 9 (7.9) | 10 (6.7) | 9 (3.7) | NS |
Diagnostic delay(M), median (IQR) | 10 (2.9) | 12 (13) | 7.5 (17) | NS |
Follow-up (M), median (IQR) | 74 (69.3) | 65 (44.5) | 78 (47.7) | NS |
Subtype | ||||
Linear | 56 | 39 | 17 | NS |
Face | 29 | 20 | 9 | NS |
Circumscribed | 23 | 4 | 19 | <0.0001 |
Mixed | 2 | 2 | 0 | NS |
Generalized | 20 | 18 | 2 | 0.004 |
Extracutaneous Involvement | 19 | 18 | 1 | 0.001 |
Clinic type | ||||
Dermatology | 29 | 2 | 27 | <0.0001 |
Rheumatology | 21 | 19 | 2 | 0.003 |
Combined | 51 | 42 | 9 | <0.0001 |
The majority of patients who were on systemic immunomodulatory therapy were treated with methotrexate (59/63, 93.6 %) and/or systemic corticosteroids (21/63, 33 %). 5 patients were treated with hydroxychloroquine, 2 of which were also on methotrexate. 6 patients on methotrexate were either switched to or had mycophenolate mofetil added as concomitant therapy. The most common adverse effects observed in methotrexate-treated patients were gastrointestinal complaints (12/61, 19.7%) and fatigue (7/61, 11.5%). The median treatment duration was 50 months (IQR: 33.5). Patients were more likely to receive systemic therapy if they were followed in rheumatology or combined rheumatology-dermatology clinics as compared to dermatology clinics. Finally, 78% of patients with jLS received systemic treatment after 2013 (a year after publication of the CARRA jLS CTP) as compared to 55% of patients prior to 2013 (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: This jLS cohort is one of the largest reported from a single center and reflects an increase in the use of systemic therapy since publication of CARRA CTPs in 2012. Further studies on long-term treatment outcomes and therapeutic approaches utilized when first-line treatment failures occur are warranted.
REFERENCES:
[1]Li SC, Torok KS, Pope E, et al. Development of consensus treatment plans for juvenile localized scleroderma: a roadmap toward comparative effectiveness studies in juvenile localized scleroderma. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken ). 2012;64(8):1175-1185.
Disclosure of Interests: Bugra Egeli: None declared, Johnathan Dallas: None declared, Edwin Anderson: None declared, Michelle Min: None declared, Daniel Mazori: None declared, Stephen Gellis: None declared, Mary Beth Son: None declared, Robert Sundel: None declared, Ruth Vleugels: None declared, Fatma Dedeoglu Consultant of: Novartis