fetching data ...

POS0828 (2022)
BIOLOGIC THERAPY IN REFRACTORY PARENCHYMAL AND NON-PARENCHYMAL NEUROBEHÇET DISEASE: NATIONAL MULTICENTER STUDY
A. Herrero-Morant1, J. L. Martín-Varillas2, S. Castañeda3, O. Maiz-Alonso4, J. Sanchez-Martin5, N. Ortego6, E. Raya6, Á. Prior-Español7, C. Moriano8, R. Melero9, J. Graña10, A. Urruticoechea-Arana11, A. Ramos Calvo12, M. Loredo Martínez13, E. Salgado-Pérez14, F. Sivera15, I. Torre-Salaberri16, J. Narváez17, J. L. Andréu Sánchez18, O. Martínez González19, R. Gómez de la Torre20, S. Fernández21, S. Romero-Yuste22, I. Gonzalez-Mazon1, C. Álvarez-Reguera1, D. Martínez-López1, J. L. Hernández1, M. Á. González-Gay1, R. Blanco1, on behalf of Neurobehçet Spanish Collaborative Group: Ana Blanco, José Luis Callejas, Anahy Brandy-García, Alejandro Olivé, Elvira Díez, Álvaro Seijas-López, Concepción Delgado-Beltrán
1Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Rheumatology and Internal Medicine, Santander, Spain
2Hospital Comarcal de Laredo, Rheumatology, Laredo, Spain
3Hospital de La Princesa, Rheumatology, Madrid, Spain
4Donostia Unibertsitate Ospitalea, Rheumatology and Ophthalmology, Donostia, Spain
5University Hospital October 12, Rheumatology, Madrid, Spain
6Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Rheumatology and Internal Medicine, Granada, Spain
7Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital, Rheumatology, Badalona, Spain
8University Hospital of León, Rheumatology, León, Spain
9Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Rheumatology, Vigo, Spain
10Coruña University Hospital, Rheumatology, A Coruña, Spain
11Hospital Can Misses, Rheumatology, Eivissa, Spain
12Complejo Hospitalario de Soria, Rheumatology, Soria, Spain
13Hospital Clinico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Rheumatology, Zaragoza, Spain
14Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense - CHUO, Rheumatology, Ourense, Spain
15Hospital General Universitario de Elda Virgen de la Salud, Rheumatology, Elda, Spain
16Basurto University Hospital, Rheumatology, Bilbo, Spain
17Hospital de Bellvitge, Rheumatology, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
18Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, Rheumatology, Majadahonda, Spain
19Salamanca University Hospital, Rheumatology, Salamanca, Spain
20Central University Hospital of Asturias, Internal Medicine, Oviedo, Spain
21Hospital of Cabueñes, Rheumatology, Gijón, Spain
22Hospital Provincial de Pontevedra, Rheumatology, Pontevedra, Spain

Background: Ocular and Neurobehçet’s Disease (NBD) are the most severe manifestations of Behcet’s disease (1-4 ). NBD can be classified as a ) primary neural parenchymal lesions, also known as parenchymal NBD (p-NBD) or b ) secondary to vascular involvement or non-parenchymal NBD (np-NBD) (4 ). Response to biologic therapy (BT) in these two refractory subtypes of NBD is unknown.


Objectives: To assess efficacy and safety of BT in refractory subtypes of NBD.


Methods: Open-label multicenter study of refractory NBD from 21 different referral National Hospitals. NBD diagnosis was based on the International Consensus Recommendation criteria (4 ). Efficacy was determined by complete or partial response and no-response. Complete, partial or no response was defined according to the resolution of the neurological syndrome (signs and/or symptoms) after the BT onset.


Results: We studied 41 patients (21 women/20 men; mean age: 40.6±10.8 years). NBD was classified as p-NBD (n= 33, 80.5%) and np-NBD (n=17, 41.5%). There were no significant differences in baseline general features and in neurological clinical response in both subgroups ( Table 1 and Figure 1 ). The first BT used in p-NBD were Infliximab (IFX) (n=15), Adalimumab (ADA) (n=11), Golimumab (GLM) (n=3), Tocilizumab (TCZ) (n=2) and Etanercept (ETN) (n=2) and in np-NBD were IFX (n=9), ADA (n=6), TCZ (n=1) and ETN (n=1).

Main features of p-NBD and np-NBD

Total p-NBD np-NBD P p-NBD vs np-NBD
Age at biological therapy initiation, years (mean±SD ) 44±13.9 41.4±9.6 39.4±10.6 0.412
Gender, n (m/f) (% ) 21/20 (48.8/52.2) 18/15 (54.5/45.5) 5/12 (29.4/70.6) 0.091
HLAB51 +/ patients tested, n (% ) 15/31 (57.7) 14/25 (58.3) 4/10 (40) 0.391
Oral aphthae, n (% ) 40 (97.6) 32 (97) 15 (88.2) 0.323
Cutaneous involvement, n (% ) 28 (63.4) 23 (69.7) 10 (58.8) 0.603
Ocular involvement, n (% ) 21 (48.8) 15 (45.5) 9 (52.9) 0.616
Vascular involvement, n (% ) 9 (22) 10 (30.3) 7 (41.2) 0.442
Articular involvement, n (% ) 9 (22) 7 (21.2) 3 (17.6) 0.765
Previous conventional Immunosuppressive drugs to BT
Azathioprine 24 (58.5) 20 (60.6) 10 (58.8) -
Methotrexate 16 (39.0) 12 (36.4) 3 (17.6) -
Cyclophosphamide 13 (31.7) 13 (39.4) 5 (29.4) -
Cyclosporine A 9 (22.0) 8 (24.2) 3 (17.6) -
Mycophenolate Mofetil 2 (4.9) 2 (6.1) 0 -

Response to biological therapy according to NBD subtypes.

After an overall mean follow-up of 57.5±50.9 months BT was switched in 22 patients due to inefficacy (n=16) or Adverse Effects (AE) (n=6) and in 4 cases was definitively discontinued because of complete prolonged remission (n=3) or AE (n=1). AE were observed in 7 (17.1%) patients. Severe AE were observed in 2 cases, one due to demyelinating disease and the other due to pulmonary tuberculosis, both in patients undergoing IFX therapy. The other 6 AE were infusion reaction to IFX (n=1), IFX-induced psoriasis (n=1), IFX-induced acneiform eruption (n=1), infusion reaction to TCZ (n=1), intolerance to IFX and recurrent mild infections (n=1) and erosive lichen planus and bullous impetigo (n=1).


Conclusion: In our series, BT seems equally effective and safe in both refractory p-NBD and np-NBD.


REFERENCES:

[1]Martín-Varillas JL, et al. Ophthalmology 2018 Sep;125(9):1444-1451. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.02.020.

[2]Atienza-Mateo B, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019 Dec;71(12):2081-2089. doi: 10.1002/art.41026.

[3]Santos-Gómez M, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2016 Sep-Oct;34(6 Suppl 102): S34-S40.

[4]Kalra S, et al. Diagnosis and management of Neuro-Behçet’s disease: international consensus recommendations. J Neurol. 2014 Sep;261(9):1662–76.


Disclosure of Interests: Alba Herrero-Morant: None declared, José Luis Martín-Varillas Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Pfizer, Lilly, Janssen, UCB, and Celgene, Santos Castañeda Paid instructor for: Assistant professor of the Cátedra UAM-ROCHE, EPID-Future, UAM, Madrid, Spain, Olga Maiz-Alonso: None declared, Julio Sanchez-Martin: None declared, Norberto Ortego: None declared, Enrique Raya: None declared, Águeda Prior-Español: None declared, Clara Moriano: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, Jenaro Graña: None declared, ANA URRUTICOECHEA-ARANA: None declared, Angel Ramos Calvo: None declared, Marta Loredo Martínez: None declared, Eva Salgado-Pérez: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, Ignacio Torre-Salaberri: None declared, J. Narváez Speakers bureau: Bristol-Myers Squibb, José Luis Andréu Sánchez: None declared, Olga Martínez González: None declared, Ricardo Gómez de la Torre: None declared, Sabela Fernández: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, Iñigo Gonzalez-Mazon: None declared, Carmen Álvarez-Reguera: None declared, David Martínez-López: None declared, J. Luis Hernández: None declared, Miguel Á. González-Gay Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Roche, Sanofi, Lilly, Celgene, Sobi, and MSD, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD, Janssen, and Roche, Ricardo Blanco Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, BMS, Janssen, and MSD, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD, and Roche


Citation: , volume 81, supplement 1, year 2022, page 704
Session: Vasculitis – small vessel vasculitis (POSTERS only)