fetching data ...

POS1031 (2022)
EARLIER CLINICAL RESPONSE PREDICT LOW RATES OF RADIOGRAPHIC PROGRESSION IN BIO-NAIVE ACTIVE PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS PATIENTS RECEIVING GUSELKUMAB TREATMENT
P. J. Mease1, A. B. Gottlieb2, A. Ogdie3, I. Mcinnes4, S. D. Chakravarty5,6, E. Rampakakis7, A. Kollmeier8, X. L. Xu8, M. Shawi9, F. Lavie10, M. Kishimoto11, P. Rahman12
1Swedish Medical Center/Providence St. Joseph Health and University of Washington, Rheumatology Research, Seattle, United States of America
2Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Dermatology, Mt Sinai, United States of America
3University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Immunology, Philadelphia, United States of America
4University of Glasgow, Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Glasgow, United Kingdom
5Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Immunology, Horsham, United States of America
6Drexel University College of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Philadelphia, United States of America
7McGill University, Department of Pediatrics, Montreal, Canada
8Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Immunology, San Diego, United States of America
9Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Immunology Global Medical Affairs, Horsham, United States of America
10Janssen Cilag Global Medial Affairs, Immunology Global Medical Affairs, Issy les Moulineaux, France
11Kyorin University School of Medicine, Department of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Mitaka, Japan
12Memorial University of Newfoundland, Discipline of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, St. John’s, Canada

Background: Guselkumab (GUS), an IL-23p19-subunit inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy and a favorable safety profile in patients (pts) with psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). In the Phase 3, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled DISCOVER-2 study, GUS 100 mg every 4 or 8 weeks (Q4W or Q8W) significantly improved joint and skin symptoms; GUS-treated pts had smaller mean changes in radiographic progression vs. PBO at W24. 1 Low rates of radiographic progression were observed through 2 years among GUS-treated pts, regardless of dosing regimen. 2,3


Objectives: Determine whether earlier clinical improvement predicts long-term radiographic progression through 2 years in DISCOVER-2.


Methods: DISCOVER-2 included biologic-naïve pts with active PsA (≥5 swollen and ≥5 tender joint counts [SJC/TJC]; CRP ≥0.6 mg/dL) randomized (1:1:1) to GUS 100 mg Q4W; GUS 100 mg at W0, W4, then Q8W; or PBO with crossover to GUS 100 mg Q4W (PBO→Q4W) at W24. For pts randomized to GUS Q4W or Q8W, predictive models (mixed linear) were developed post-hoc to assess the associations of earlier (at W16) improvement in disease activity (DAPSA remission, DAPSA Improvement, DAPSA Improvement more than the median of 20.7 [>20.7]) or skin improvement (PASI90, PASI≤1) with changes in total PsA modified van der Heijde-Sharp [vdH-S] score through W100, after adjusting for known baseline (BL) determinants of radiographic progression (vdH-S score, age, gender, and CRP).


Results: PsA duration, CRP, and SJC at BL weakly correlated with BL vdH-S score. No correlation was seen between BL PASI and BL vdH-S score ( Table 1 ). Greater improvement in DAPSA score (β [95%CI]: -0.03 [-0.04, -0.01]) and improvement >20.7 in DAPSA from BL to W16 was associated with significantly less radiographic progression through W100 after adjusting for BL DAPSA score, vdH-S score, age, gender, and CRP level. Achievement of PASI90, PASI≤1, and DAPSA remission at W16 was associated with numerically less radiographic progression through W100 after adjusting for BL PASI, vdH-S score, age, gender, and CRP ( Figure ).

Correlation of Select BL Disease Characteristics with BL vdH-S Score Among GUS Randomized Pts

BL Determinants Spearman’s correlation coefficient p-value
Age 0.27335 <.0001
CRP 0.28181 <.0001
PASI Score 0.03078 0.5153
PsA Duration 0.37070 <.0001
PsO Duration 0.20509 <.0001
SJC (66) 0.26321 <.0001

Conclusion: In GUS-treated biologic-naïve pts with active PsA, following adjustment for known BL determinants of radiographic progression, earlier (W16) DAPSA improvement was a significant predictor of less radiographic progression through W100; DAPSA remission and skin improvement at W16 each showed a numerical trend toward less radiographic progression through W100.


REFERENCES:

[1]Mease PJ, et al. Lancet . 2020;395:1126–36.

[2]McInnes IB, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol . 2021;73:604-16.

[3]McInnes IB, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Nov 1. doi: 10.1002/art.42010. Online ahead of print.


Disclosure of Interests: Philip J Mease Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Aclaris, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Inmagene, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, and UCB, Alice B Gottlieb Speakers bureau: AnaptsysBio, Avotres Therapeutics, Beiersdorf, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Incyte, GSK, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., UCB, and Dermavant, Consultant of: AnaptsysBio, Avotres Therapeutics, Beiersdorf, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Incyte, GSK, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., UCB, and Dermavant, Grant/research support from: Boehringer Ingelheim, Incyte, Janssen, Novartis, UCB, Xbiotech, and Sun Pharma, Alexis Ogdie Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, CorEvitas, Gilead, Happify Health, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: University of Pennsylvania from Abbvie, Pfizer and Novartis and to Forward from Amgen, Iain McInnes Shareholder of: Causeway Therapeutics, and Evelo Compugen, Consultant of: Astra Zeneca, AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Cabaletta, Compugen, GSK, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Roche, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Astra Zeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Roche, and UCB, Soumya D Chakravarty Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC and Drexel University College of Medicine, Emmanouil Rampakakis Consultant of: Janssen, Employee of: JSS Medical Research, Alexa Kollmeier Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Xie L Xu Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, May Shawi Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Frederic Lavie Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Cilag Global Medial Affairs, Mitsumasa Kishimoto Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen-Astellas BioPharma, Asahi-Kasei Pharma, Astellas, Ayumi Pharma, BMS, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Novartis, Pfizer, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Teijin Pharma, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen-Astellas BioPharma, Asahi-Kasei Pharma, Astellas, Ayumi Pharma, BMS, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Novartis, Pfizer, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Teijin Pharma, and UCB, Proton Rahman Speakers bureau: Janssen, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Janssen and Novartis


Citation: , volume 81, supplement 1, year 2022, page 828
Session: Psoriatic arthritis - treatment (POSTERS only)