fetching data ...

POS0914 (2024)
GLUCOCORTICOIDS IN PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: RESULTS OF THE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW INFORMING THE EULAR TASK FORCE ON ANTIRHEUMATIC DRUGS IN REPRODUCTION, PREGNANCY AND LACTATION
Keywords: Glucocorticoids, Safety, Pregnancy and reproduction
S. Hamroun1, A. Pluma Sanjurjo2, L. Rüegg3, M. Kramer4, Y. Meissner4, A. Finckh5, F. Förger3
1Cochin Unversity Hospital, Paris, France
2Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Rheumatology, Barcelona, Spain
3Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Bern, Switzerland
4German Rheumatism Research Centre Berlin, Epidemiology and Health Services Research, Berlin, Germany
5Geneva University Hospital, Rheumatology, Geneva, Switzerland

Background: The management of women with musculoskeletal disorders during pregnancy and lactation presents many challenges. Since the first EULAR points to consider for the use of antirheumatic drugs before pregnancy, and during pregnancy and lactation published in 2016[1], new relevant data has emerged.


Objectives: To inform the EULAR task force on the safety of antirheumatic drugs during pregnancy and lactation by a systematic literature review (SLR). This analysis focusses on the impact of glucocorticoids (GC) use during pregnancy and lactation.


Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane and LactMed from April 2015 to April 2023, including articles in English, French, Spanish and German. All studies relating to the effect of GC on adverse pregnancy, maternal and infant’s outcomes in pregnant or breastfeeding women with an indication for antirheumatic drugs were eligible. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. We used narrative synthesis in case of heterogeneity regarding population or outcome. If the quality and the statistical homogeneity of included studies was sufficient, we pooled the reported outcomes and conducted a meta-analysis, using effect estimates from studies with adjustments for confounding factors. This analysis employed a random effect model. Odds ratios (OR) and risks ratios (RR) with adjustment for disease activity were used to assess the associations.


Results: Within 307 eligible publications (including all drugs and outcomes considered in the SLR), 21 articles (20 cohort studies, 1 case series) including 8777 pregnancies were included for pregnancy outcomes and 5 articles (3 cohort studies, 2 case reports) including 32 patients were included for lactation outcomes.

Regarding exposure during pregnancy, 20 studies concerned oral GC and 1 study intravenous methylprednisolone (MP) pulses. The rates of miscarriage, stillbirth, major congenital malformation, preterm birth, low birth weight, small for gestational age, maternal hypertension were 9.4%, 2.3%, 5.2%, 18.2%, 22.2%, 5.2% and 5.5%, respectively. The incidence of serious maternal infection reported in 1 study was 3.4 per 100 person-year. For MP pulses, only a case series of 5 patients was found and provided little evidence.

A meta-analysis was carried out on the risk of preterm birth with GC exposure during pregnancy: the pooled OR of the adjusted effect estimates (including 1977 exposed pregnancies compared to 11 336 pregnancies in diseased controls[2–5]) was 2.24 [1.73-2.91] (I 2 =0%) and the pooled RR of the adjusted effect estimates (including 894 exposed pregnancies compared to 2 887 pregnancies in controls[6–9] (1281 in healthy controls and 1606 in diseased controls) was 1.53 [0.98-2.37] (I 2 =62%) (figure 1). In 3 studies reporting of dose of GC, a dose-dependent effect was observed, with more preterm births with higher GC doses.

Regarding lactation, 1 study reported prednisone/prednisolone and 4 MP pulse exposures (Table 1). The milk:plasma ratios ranged between 0.02 and 0.60. Drug levels after MP pulses were highest in the first hour post-dose, dropped exponentially within 4 hours and reached average levels between 0.32 and 1.40 µg/ml. All relative infant doses were very low, ranging between 0.09 and 0.60%. One study reported no adverse events in exposed infants during a 3-12 months follow-up phase.


Conclusion: An increased risk of preterm birth associated with GC exposure during pregnancy was found, which argues for a minimal maintenance dose and the use of a GC sparing agent with pregnancy-compatible cs/bDMARD. However, the amounts of oral and pulse GC in breastmilk are very low and no short-term adverse effects in breastfed infants were reported.

Meta-analysis of association between GC exposure during pregnancy and preterm birth.

Table 1. Result of the EULAR-SLR 2015-2023 on GC during lactation.


REFERENCES: [1] Götestam Skorpen. PMID: 26888948.

[2] Bröms G. PMID: 24810137.

[3] Kanis S.-L. PMID: 33046558.

[4] Odufalu F.-D. PMID: 34686575.

[5] Jolving L.-R. PMID: 37046314.

[6] Smith CJF. PMID: 30133181.

[7] Smith CJF. PMID: 31074583.

[8] Palmsten K. PMID: 32791247.

[9] Palmsten K. PMID: 35089649.


Acknowledgements: NIL.


Disclosure of Interests: Sabrina Hamroun: None declared, Andrea Pluma Sanjurjo: None declared, Linda Rüegg: None declared, Malte Kramer: None declared, Yvette Meissner Pfizer, Lilly, Axel Finckh: None declared, Frauke Förger Mepha, Roche, UCB Pharma, MSD, GSK.


DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2024-eular.4171
Keywords: Glucocorticoids, Safety, Pregnancy and reproduction
Citation: , volume 83, supplement 1, year 2024, page 1152
Session: Across diseases (Poster View)