fetching data ...

OP0168 (2025)
CLINICAL IMPACT OF INCOMPLETE B-CELL DEPLETION IN ANCA-ASSOCIATED VASCULITIS PATIENTS RECEIVING MAINTENANCE RITUXIMAB THERAPY: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
Keywords: Adaptive immunity, Observational studies/registry, Biological DMARD, Remission
C. Ricordi1,2, J. Liberatore5, M. Beydon6, P. Cohen3, B. Donogué3, C. Mettler8, B. Thoreau7, L. Mouthon3,4, X. Puéchal3,4, B. Terrier3,4
1Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Unit of Rheumatology, Reggio Emilia, Italy
2Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
3Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, Service de Médecine Interne, Paris, France
4Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
5Centre Hospitalier d’Angouleme, Service de Médecine Interne, Angouleme, France
6Université Paris Saclay, Kremlin Bicetre, Paris, France
7CHRU Brettoneau - Tours, Service de Médecine interne, Tours, France
8Hôpital Bichat - Claude-Bernard, AP-HP, Service de Médecine Interne, Paris, France

Background: B cells play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAV), as evidenced by the efficacy of B-cell depleting therapy with the monoclonal anti-CD20 agent, rituximab (RTX), in multiple randomized controlled trials [1–4]. RTX is now the standard of care for both induction and maintenance of remission in AAV, as endorsed by the latest guidelines [5,6]. Achieving sustained remission is crucial to minimize the risk of relapses, which can lead to long-term organ damage, both from disease activity itself and from prolonged immunosuppressive therapy. However, reliable predictors of relapse remain elusive. CD19+ B-cell quantification is recommended as part of disease activity monitoring in AAV, yet its prognostic significance is still debated.


Objectives: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of incomplete B-cell depletion during RTX maintenance therapy in AAV patients and to evaluate its impact on the risk of relapse and disease management.


Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center cohort study at Cochin Hospital, including patients who fulfilled the 2022 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for AAV and had received at least two years of RTX maintenance therapy (fixed-dose, 500 mg every 6 months). Clinical, biological, and treatment data were collected and analyzed.


Results: Among 202 patients screened, 175 were included (Table 1). Induction therapy prior to RTX maintenance comprised RTX (375 mg/m²/week in 65.7%, or 1 g two weeks apart in 21.1%) or cyclophosphamide (13.7%). The median duration of RTX maintenance was 19 months (IQR 19–37). At initiation of RTX maintenance (Month 0), incomplete B-cell depletion (CD19+ ≥1/µL) was observed in 31.4% of patients. The proportion of incomplete B-cell depletion remained stable during follow-up: 28.6% at Month 6, 32.6% at Month 12, and 33.1% at Month 18. During RTX maintenance, 9.7% of patients experienced relapses (12 minor, 9 major), with incomplete B-cell depletion in 47.4% and complete depletion in 52.6% of relapsing cases. After 18 months, 37.7% of patients continued RTX maintenance for additional 24 (IQR 14-25) months, and 62.3% of patients discontinued RTX maintenance, with a follow-up of 58 months (IQR 32–81) after the last RTX infusion. Among the latter, 27.5% experienced relapses post-RTX discontinuation (13 minor, 17 major). All relapse and major relapse-free survival were comparable between patients with incomplete and complete B-cell depletion during RTX maintenance, regardless of the CD19+ threshold used (1/µL or 5/µL) (Figure 1).


Conclusion: Our data suggest that approximately one third of AAV patients exhibit incomplete B-cell depletion during RTX maintenance therapy. However, this was not associated with an increased risk of relapse, suggesting that achieving complete B-cell depletion may not be mandatory for effective disease control during maintenance.


REFERENCES: [1] Guillevin L, Pagnoux C, Karras A, et al. Rituximab versus azathioprine for maintenance in ANCA-associated vasculitis. N Engl J Med . 2014;371:1771–80. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMOA1404231.

[2] JH S, PA M, R S, et al. Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis. N Engl J Med . 2010;363:168. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMOA0909905.

[3] Jones RB, Cohen Tervaert JW, Hauser T, et al. Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide in ANCA-associated renal vasculitis. N Engl J Med . 2010;363:211–20. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMOA0909169.

[4] Specks U, Merkel PA, Seo P, et al. Efficacy of remission-induction regimens for ANCA-associated vasculitis. N Engl J Med . 2013;369:417–27. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMOA1213277.

[5] Hellmich B, Sanchez-Alamo B, Schirmer JH, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis: 2022 update. Ann Rheum Dis . 2024;83:30–47. DOI: 10.1136/ARD-2022-223764.

[6] Floege J, Jayne DRW, Sanders JSF, et al. KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody (ANCA)–Associated Vasculitis. Kidney Int . 2024;105:S71–116. DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2023.10.008.

Baseline clinical features of the study cohort

N=175
Median (IQR) age at diagnosis 53 (36-66)
Female 102 (58,3%)
GPA 141 (80,6%)
MPA 34 (19,4%)
PR3-ANCA 101 (57,7%)
MPO-ANCA 55 (31,4%)
newly diagnosed disease 91 (52%)
relapsing disease 84 (48%)
ENT involvement 124 (70,8%)
Pulmonary involvement 110 (62,8%)
Renal involvement 91 (52%)
Nervous system involvement 34 (19,4%)
Ocular involvement 54 (30,8%)
GI involvement 11 (6,3%)
Cardiac involvement 12 (6,8%)
median (IQR) BVAS 9 (6-15)
median (IQR) CD19/µl 109 (30-219)
RTX induction regimen 152 (86,8%)
CYC induction regimen 24 (13,7%)
FFS ≥ 1 89 (50,8%)

Data are reported as n (%) or mean (SD).

ANCA= antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies; BVAS= Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score; CYC= cyclophosphamide; ENT=ear, nose, throat; FFS= five factor score; GI= gastrointestinal; GPA= granulomatosis with polyangiitis; MPA= microscopic polyangiitis; MPO= myeloperoxidase; PR3= proteinase 3; RTX= rituximab.

Kaplan-Meier curves illustrating all relapse-free survival and major relapse-free survival according to B-cell depletion status during rituximab (RTX) maintenance therapy in ANCA-associated vasculitis patients. (Upper left) All relapse-free survival based on a CD19+ B-cell threshold of 1/mm³; (Upper right) Major relapse-free survival based on a CD19+ B-cell threshold of 1/mm³; (Lower left) All relapse-free survival based on a CD19+ B-cell threshold of 5/mm³; (Lower right) Major relapse-free survival based on a CD19+ B-cell threshold of 5/mm³. Solid lines represent patients with complete B-cell depletion, while dashed lines indicate those with incomplete B-cell depletion.


Acknowledgements: NIL.


Disclosure of Interests: None declared.

© The Authors 2025. This abstract is an open access article published in Annals of Rheumatic Diseases under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ). Neither EULAR nor the publisher make any representation as to the accuracy of the content. The authors are solely responsible for the content in their abstract including accuracy of the facts, statements, results, conclusion, citing resources etc.


DOI: annrheumdis-2025-eular.B1054
Keywords: Adaptive immunity, Observational studies/registry, Biological DMARD, Remission
Citation: , volume 84, supplement 1, year 2025, page 137
Session: Clinical Abstract Sessions: Drop the ANCA, save that vessel! (Oral Presentations)