fetching data ...

POS1123 (2025)
Myositis Community Proposes a Framework to Guide Clinical Trials and Ensure Patient Safety during Influx of CAR-Based Therapies
Keywords: Patient-led research, Diversity, Equity, And Inclusion (DEI), Qualitative research, Quality of care, Clinical Trial
L. A. Saketkoo1, K. Cheng2,36,46, I de Groot2,3,4,5, M de Visser1,10, S. Shenoi1,11, M. Dimachkie1,9, G. Gilkeson1,12, V. P. Werth1,13, J. Day1,2,14,15, J. Paul1,16, K. A. Chandwar1,17, T. Gono1,18, L. Gupta1,38,39, J. Paik1,19, A. Valenzuela Vegara1,20, F. Muehlensiepen6,7, E. Naddaf1,8, F. C. Ernste1,8, J. Albayda1,19, P. Basharat1,21, H. Alexanderson1,22, B. Shafranski2, K. Highland1,24, L. Christopher Stine1,19, V. Venerito1,25, L. Kobert26, C. Galloway3,27, C. V. Oddis1,2,28, R. Nicolai29, J. Koopman30, E. Marrani31, H. So32, J. Andrews33, C von Muhlen34, A. Khojah35, R. Mirza37, P. Vignesh40, A. Huber41, E. Dourado42,43, M. Giannini44, M. Kuwana1,18, V. Leclair45, L. Chung47, A. S. Zubair48, J. Sanchez2, C. W. Tseng49, M. Lubinus50, A. Meyer44, D Brito de Araujo51, S. Moghadam-Kia28, B. Yi19, B. Bader-Meunier52, M. Sumaila53,76, F. Gok54, L. Andrade Ortega55, P. Gordon56, A. Allenzara57, A. Haemel58, N. Olsen59, M. Shaaf60, R. Gomez61, J. M. de Souza62, W. Gregory63, A. Sharma28, M. López-Corbeto64, I. Ventura65, N. Gonzalez66, C. Papadopoulou67, G bird68, M. Fornaro69, J. Vencovský1,70, J. Makowska71, A. Benitez1,61, A. Fernandez72, S. O’Connor73, M. Groener19, A. Dihkan2,74, C. Lowe2,75, P. Machado1,23
1MIHRA - Myositis International Health & Research Collaborative Alliance, Delaware, United States of America
2MIHRA - Myositis International Health & Research Collaborative Alliance, Patient Advisory, Delaware, United States of America
3The Myositis Association (TMA), Medical Advisory Board, Baltimore, United States of America
4Dutch Myositis Working Group, Spierziekten Nederland, Baarn, Netherlands
5EULAR PARE Study Group for Collaborative Research, Kilchberg, Switzerland
6Brandenburg Medical School, Center for Health Services Research, Neuruppin, Germany
7Universite Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
8Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States of America
9Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, United States of America
10University Medical Center - Amsterdam, Neuromuscular Diseases, Amsterdam, Netherlands
11University of Washington - Seattle Children’s Hospital, Rheumatology, Seattle, United States of America
12Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, United States of America
13University of Pennsylvannia, Dermatology, Philadelphia, United States of America
14Royal Melbourne Hospital, Rheumatology, Melbourne, Australia
15Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Inflammation Division, Melbourne, Australia
16University of Ohio, Rheumatology, Columbus, United States of America
17Zydus Hospitals, Immunology & Rheumatology, Ahmedabad, India
18Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
19Johns Hopkins Medical Center, Baltimore, United States of America
20Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
21Western University, London, Ontaria, Canada
22Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
23University College London, London, United Kingdom
24Cleveland Clinic Institute, Pulmonary Medicine, Cleveland, United States of America
25University of Bari, Bari, Italy
26The Myositis Association (TMA), Baltimore, United States of America
27The Myositis Association (TMA), Board Member, Baltimore, United States of America
28University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States of America
29IRCCS Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesu, Rome, Italy
30Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Clinical Immunology, Rotterdam, Netherlands
31Ospedale Pediatrico Meyer Firenze, Pediatric Rheumatology, Florence, Italy
32The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Rheumatology, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
33University of Alabama - Birmingham, Rheumatology, Birmingham, United States of America
34RHEUMA Clinic for Rheumatic Diseases, Port Alegre, Brazil
35Umm Al-Qura University, College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
36iMyoS, Board Member, Patient Advisory, Goettingen, Germany
37McMaster University, Ontario, Canada
38University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
39Royal Wolverhampton Hospital, Wolverhamptom, United Kingdom
40Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Pediatric Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Chandigarh, India
41Dalhousie University - IWK Health Centre, Pediatric Rheumatology, Halifax, Canada
42Unidade Local de Saude de Regiao de Aveiro, Rheumatology, Aveiro, Portugal
43Egas Moniz Health Alliance, Aveiro Rheumatology Research Centre, Aveiro, Portugal
44University Hospital of Strasbourg, Cedex, France
45McGill University, Montreal, Canada
46Myositis Support and Understanding, European Patient Advocate, Lincoln, United States of America
47Stanford University, Palo Alto, United States of America
48Yale School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, New Haven, United States of America
49Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, Taiwan, China
50Myositis Support and Understanding, Patient Advisory, Board of Directors, Lincoln, United States of America
51Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil
52IMAGINE Institute, Reference Center for Rare Systemic Rheumatological and Autoimmune Diseases, Paris, France
53Holy Family Hospital, Accra, Ghana
54Medicana International Ankara Hospital, Department of Pediatric Nephrology and Rheumatology, Ankara, Türkiye
55National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
56King’s College Hospital London, Rheumatology, London, United Kingdom
57University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States of America
58University of California - San Francisco, Dermatology, San Francisco, United States of America
59Penn State University, Hershey, United States of America
60Rheumatology Clinics, Pakistan, Pakistan
61University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
62Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil
63Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Physiotherapy, Salford, United Kingdom
64University Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Pediatric Rheumatology, Barcelona, Spain
65University of Chicago, Chicago, United States of America
66Duke University, Durham, United States of America
67Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
68National Health Servidce, Pediatric Neurology, Southampton, United Kingdom
69University of Bari, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, Bari, Italy
70Institute of Rheumatology, Prague, Czech Republic
71Medical University of Lodz, Rheumatology, Lodz, Poland
72Cleveland Clinic Institute, Cleveland, United States of America
73Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati, United States of America
74Swedish Myositis Society, Stockholm, Sweden
75Myositis Association Australia, Berry, Australia
76Christian Health Association of Ghana, General surgery, Techiman- Bono East Region, Ghana

Background: Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) and other cellular targets holds promise for ‘refractory’ connective tissue diseases (CTDs) through potential ‘resetting’ the cellularity of bone marrow and thus re-directing the behaviour of the immune system. The intention is to bring the disease course to potential complete ‘remission’ [1]. Lately, there has been a surge in clinical trials in myositis, and a growing number of CAR therapy trials since a case series of successfully treated patients with CTDs were published [2]. In the myositis rare disease space, a total of 42 interventional drug trials worldwide are currently recruiting of which 19 (45%) are CAR therapies [3].


Objectives: Amidst confusion and pressure expressed by both patients and early investigators, the Myositis International Health & Research Collaborative Alliance (MIHRA) Clinical Trial Sites Network (CTSN) set out to systematically identify concerns which were increasingly expressed in our global network of patient organisations, with the hypothesis that actionable concerns related to CAR trials will emerge from community-voiced perceptions & experiences [4, 5].


Methods: Qualitative investigations in an open-ended, unrestricted response survey design queried two major myositis stakeholders 1. Patients/patient supporters and 2. Investigators. Stakeholders were contacted through the MIHRA investigator membership, MIHRA Patient Contact Registry and outreach efforts by the MIHRA Patient Advisory. In addition, a global forum to present and discuss the interim analysis with investigators and patients occurred on 14 December 2024 [6]. Respondents self-reported their role and demographic details. Due to perceived urgency and to avoid delays in the anticipated need for task force formation, a multi-stage grounded theory analysis was devised to use the results from the 1st stage of the analysis to identify major/urgent, actionable concerns and, if so, to convene as a community in a timely manner to develop strategies that address these. In the stage 1 analysis (reported here), globally repetitive concepts are extracted by manual coding. In the stage 2 analysis, a highly detailed deductive qualitative content analysis supported by large language model applications will take place.


Results: 103 patient and 77 pediatric & adult investigator respondents from 32 countries/6 continents participated in the study. Stage 1 analysis yielded 7 preliminary ‘concern’ domains of which 3 were shared by both groups with sub-domains (diagram) some with overlapping concepts. Four urgent patient & investigator collaborations were identified during the forum which were to establish:

1. Educational materials and communication protocols that are patient-centered and patient-driven/developed which are a perceived as a critical unmet need voiced in this effort.

2. Preliminary treatment algorithm defining ‘refractory’ that accounts for disease activity, severity, rate of progression and extent of irreversible though symptomatic damage.

3. Preliminary models for logistics of site initiation and inter-disciplinary collaboration.

4. Dialogue between regulatory agencies, industry, and the patient and investigator communities to strategize a cautious combined rate of enrollment during this discovery period and attempt to stabilise the trial landscape to protect the investigations of other promising therapeutics with possibly wider relevance than CAR therapies.

Further deliverables are anticipated with Stage 2 analyses.

Table 1.


Conclusion: CAR therapies offer promising potential in CTDs, providing targeted and long-lasting treatments through the potential of directing the immune system to act with precision. However, both sets of stakeholders express strong concern that the surge in CAR-based therapy trials is ‘overwhelming’ with high pressure for patient enrollment and site initiation. But yet, there is insufficient safety information and many unknowns for the projected rate of enrollment in CTDs and IIMs, populations that are very different than the originally studied oncology populations. Furthermore, there is lack of adequate investigator & patient educational materials, which has been voiced as potentially compromising the consent process. Also voiced were the challenges for sites inexperienced in non-oncological CAR therapy applications who are struggling to navigate site initiation and voice being ill-equipped to manage financial and procedural logistics to ensure timely activation, quality implementation, and with proper safety measures in place. Based on these analyses, immediate action is being planned to address urgent needs.


REFERENCES: [1] Schett G et al. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2024 Sep;20(9):531-544.

[2] Müller F et al. N Engl J Med. 2024 Feb 22;390(8):687-700.

[3] www.clinicaltrials.gov . Last accessed 12 January 2025.

[4] Saketkoo LA et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2024 Feb;42(2):207-212.

[5] Azevedo SF et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 Oct 21;83(11):e22.

[6] Saketkoo et al, https://mihrafoundation.org/mihra-ctsn-car-t-trials-community-forum/ ; last accessed 12 January 2025.


Acknowledgements: NIL.


Disclosure of Interests: Lesley Ann Saketkoo The list presented for the 1st author is representative of conflict of interest for all authors: Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, Abbvie, The list presented for the 1st author is representative of conflict of interest for all authors: Argenx, aTyr, Boehringer Ingelheim, EMD Serono, Pfizer, The list presented for the 1st author is representative of conflict of interest for all authors: Argenx, aTyr, EMD Serono, Horizon, Kinevant, Mallinckrodt, Pfizer, Karen Cheng Sobi Pharmaceuticals, Ingrid de Groot: None declared, Marianne de Visser Please see 1st author listing, Please see 1st author listing, Susan Shenoi: None declared, Mazen Dimachkie Several - please see 1st author listing, Several - please see 1st author listing, Gary Gilkeson Several - please see 1st author listing, several - please see 1st author listing, Victoria P. Werth several - please see 1st author listing, several, please see 1st author listing, Jessica Day NKARTA, several - please see 1st author listing, Jisna Paul Please see 1st author listing, Kunal Ashutosh Chandwar: None declared, Takahisa Gono Please see 1st author listing, Please see 1st author listing, Latika Gupta Please see 1st author listing, Please see 1st author listing, Julie Paik Please see 1st author listings, Please see 1st author listings, Please see 1st author listings, Antonia Valenzuela Vegara Please see 1st author listings, Please see 1st author listings, Felix Muehlensiepen AbbVie, Novartis, AbbVie, Novartis, Elie Naddaf Please see listing in 1st author, Please see listing in 1st author, Please see listing in 1st author, Floranne C. Ernste: None declared, Jemima Albayda Please see listing under 1st author, Please see listing under 1st author, Please see listing under 1st author, Pari Basharat: None declared, Helene Alexanderson: None declared, Barbara Shafranski: None declared, Kristin Highland Please see 1st author listing, Please see 1st author listing, Please see 1st author listing, Lisa Christopher Stine Please see 1st author listing, Please see 1st author listing, Please see 1st author listing, Vincenzo Venerito Please see 1st author listing, Please see 1st author listing, Please see 1st author listing, Linda Kobert: None declared, Chip Galloway: None declared, Chester V Oddis Please see 1st author listing, Please see 1st author listing, Please see 1st author listing, Rebecca Nicolai: None declared, Jacob Koopman: None declared, Edoardo Marrani: None declared, Ho So: None declared, James Andrews: None declared, Carlos von Muhlen: None declared, Amer Khojah: None declared, Reza Mirza: None declared, Pandiarajan Vignesh: None declared, Adam Huber: None declared, Eduardo Dourado: None declared, Margherita Giannini: None declared, Masataka Kuwana Please see 1st author listings, Please see 1st author listings, Please see 1st author listings, Valérie Leclair: None declared, Lorinda Chung Kyverna, CRSPR Tx, Kyverna, CRISPR Tx, Adeel S. Zubair: None declared, Joseph Sanchez: None declared, Chih-Wei Tseng: None declared, Manuel Lubinus: None declared, Alain Meyer: None declared, DANIEL BRITO DE ARAUJO: None declared, Siamak Moghadam-Kia: None declared, Belina Yi: None declared, Brigitte Bader-Meunier: None declared, Mintah Sumaila: None declared, Faysal Gok: None declared, Lilia Andrade Ortega: None declared, Patrick Gordon: None declared, Astia Allenzara: None declared, Anna Haemel: None declared, Nancy Olsen: None declared, Muhammad Shaaf: None declared, Ramiro Gomez: None declared, Jean Marcus de Souza: None declared, William Gregory: None declared, Akanksha Sharma: None declared, Mireia López-Corbeto: None declared, Iazsmin Ventura: None declared, Natalia Gonzalez: None declared, Charalampia Papadopoulou: None declared, georgina bird: None declared, Marco Fornaro: None declared, Jiří Vencovský: None declared, Joanna Makowska: None declared, Alejandro Benitez: None declared, Anthony Fernandez: None declared, Shannon O’Connor: None declared, Marwin Groener: None declared, Anneli Dihkan: None declared, Christine Lowe: None declared, Pedro Machado Please see 1st author listing, Please see 1st author listing, Please see 1st author listing.

© The Authors 2025. This abstract is an open access article published in Annals of Rheumatic Diseases under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ). Neither EULAR nor the publisher make any representation as to the accuracy of the content. The authors are solely responsible for the content in their abstract including accuracy of the facts, statements, results, conclusion, citing resources etc.


DOI: annrheumdis-2025-eular.B1260
Keywords: Patient-led research, Diversity, Equity, And Inclusion (DEI), Qualitative research, Quality of care, Clinical Trial
Citation: , volume 84, supplement 1, year 2025, page 1204
Session: Poster View VII (Poster View)