Background: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has been shown to reduce symptoms and risk of cardiovascular comorbidity for individuals with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) without exacerbating disease activity [1]. However, supervised exercise is resource-intensive and clinically difficult to manage. Also, adherence to HIIT tends to decrease over time which can have implications for determining the effects of HIIT [2]. More knowledge on adherence to self-managed HIIT is needed to tailor training individually and provide sustainable exercise routines.
Objectives: To study adherence of attendance, duration and intensity in a 12-week intervention with self-managed digitally based HIIT among individuals with axSpA and whether adherence changes for each four-week block during the intervention.
Methods: This study is part of an ongoing RCT including 44 participants, recruited from rheumatology clinics in southern Sweden. The participants were randomized to a HIIT intervention group (HIIT-G; n= 22) or to a control group (not included in this analysis). The HIIT-G conducted three high-intensity training sessions/week for 12 weeks and were regularly digitally coached by a physiotherapist. Two sessions per week were interval training in self-selected activities. All participants were equipped with a fitness watch measuring the heart rate (HR) continuously during the training sessions. The fitness watch had three preset HIIT protocols, 4x4/ 5x3/ 8x2 minutes. The HIIT-G participants were instructed to get at least a total of 15 minutes of interval time in each session, and to reach at least 90% of their maximum HR (HR max ) at some point during each interval. Sex, age, self-reported disease activity (BASDAI, 0-10 best-worst), physical function (BASFI, 0-10 best-worst), health status (EQ-5D, 0-1 worst-best) and assessment of aerobic capacity (VO 2 max, mlO 2 /kg/min) at baseline were used to describe the HIIT-G characteristics. Adherence to attendance was measured as the number of sessions attended compared to sessions prescribed. Adherence to duration was set as a cut-off where only training sessions ≥30 minutes were included in the analysis. Adherence to intensity was measured as 1) the number of sessions where the participants reached at least one minute in HR ≥90% of HR max (1min HR≥90) and 2) minutes in HR zone ≥90% of HR max (HR≥90). Statistics included comparisons between each block of four weeks (month 1 – 3; M1, M2, M3), using one-way repeated measures ANOVA. In case of significant ANOVA, post-hoc analyses were made.
Results: Results are based on 20 participants (women n=10) who completed the 12-week HIIT intervention (two dropouts). The participants mean ± SD age was 45 ± 12 years, BASDAI 2.8 ± 1.2, BASFI 1.4 ± 1.1, EQ-5D 0.8 ± 0.1, and VO 2 max 35 ± 8 mlO 2 /kg/min. Over the 12 weeks, participants completed 30.2 ± 5.7 sessions which corresponds to 84% of the 36 prescribed sessions. Moreover, over 12 weeks they reached 1min HR≥90 in 16.8 ± 7.6 sessions (55% of attended sessions) and spent a total of 94.0 ± 68.4 minutes in HR≥90 (Table 1). Analyses between M1, M2, and M3 showed that attendance decreased significantly from 11.0 ± 1.1 (92%) sessions in M1 to 9.2 ± 3.0 (77%) sessions in M3 (ANOVA p=0.03; Table 1). The participants reached 1min HR≥90 in 59% of attended sessions in M1 and 52% of attended sessions in both M2 and M3 (ANOVA p=0.06). The time spent in HR>90 did not change significantly, with 34.3 ± 20.1 minutes in M1, 30.7 ± 27.5 minutes M2 and 29.0 ± 30.0 minutes M3 (ANOVA p=0.36; Table 1).
Adherence of attendance and intensity for the participants (n=20).
All 12 weeks | M1
| M2
| M3
| ANOVA
| Post-hoc
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Attended
| 30.2 ± 5.7
| 11.0 ± 1.1
| 10.0 ± 2.4
| 9.2 ± 3.0
| 0.01 | M1 vs M3 0.03 |
Attended sessions
| 16.8 ± 7.6
| 6.4 ± 2.0
| 5.4 ± 3.4
| 5.0 ± 3.5
| 0.06 | |
Time in zone ≥90 % of HR max (min) | 94.0 ± 68.4 | 34.3 ± 20.1 | 30.7 ± 27.5 | 29.0 ± 30.0 | 0.36 |
Values are mean ± SD, with percentages of total 36 sessions possible (%). Statistical analyses for month (M) 1, M2 and M3 with a one-way repeated measures ANOVA, Bonferroni post-hoc analysis. 1min heart rate (HR)≥90: At least one minute spent in the HR zone ≥90% of HR max during one session.
Conclusion: This study shows high adherence of attendance to self-managed digitally based HIIT among individuals with axSpA, performed outside the healthcare settings and with support of a physiotherapist. The participants reached 1min HR≥90 in more than half of the sessions attended. Adherence of attendance decreased over time, but the time spent in zone HR≥90 did not change.
REFERENCES: [1] Sveaas SH, Bilberg A, Berg IJ, Provan SA, Rollefstad S, Semb AG, et al. High intensity exercise for 3 months reduces disease activity in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA): a multicentre randomised trial of 100 patients. Br J Sports Med. 2019.
[2] Taylor JL, Holland DJ, Keating SE, Bonikowske AR, Coombes JS. Adherence to High-intensity Interval Training in Cardiac Rehabilitation. A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2021.
Acknowledgements: We would like to thank the participants involved in the study and the funders: The Swedish Rheumatism Association, The Norrbacka-Eugenia Foundation, and Stig Thunes´ Foundation.
Disclosure of Interests: None declared.
© The Authors 2025. This abstract is an open access article published in Annals of Rheumatic Diseases under the CC BY-NC-ND license (