fetching data ...

POS0273 (2026)
GENETIC BIOMARKERS OF CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS OF GIANT CELL ARTERITIS DEFINE FOUR CLINICALLY-RELEVANT GENETIC SUBGROUPS
Keywords: Autoimmunity, Epitranscriptomics, Epigenetics, And genetics, Biomarkers, -omics
G. Borrego-Yaniz1, V. Fuentes-Moreno1, L. Ortiz-Fernández1, J. Hernández-Rodríguez2, S. Mackie3,4, A. Vaglio5,6, S. Castañeda7, R. Solans-Laqué8, J. Mestre Torres8, N. Khalidi9, C. Langford10, S. R. Ytterberg11, L. Beretta12, M. Govoni13, G. Emmi14,15, M. A. Cimmino16, T. Witte17, T. Neumann18,19, J. Holle20, V. Schönau21, G. Pugnet22, T. Papo23, J. Haroche24, A. Mahr19, L. Mouthon25, Ø. Molberg26, A. Diamantopoulos27, A. Voskuyl28, T. Daikeler29, C. Berger30, E. Molloy31, Y. van Sleen32, L. Sorensen33, R. Luqmani34, S. GCA Group35, U. G. Consortium36, V. C. Research Consortium37, N. Ortego-Centeno38, E. Brouwer32, P. Lamprecht39, S. Klapa39, C. Salvarani40, P. Merkel41,42, M. C. Cid2, M. Iles33,43, M. Á. González-Gay44,45, A. Morgan33,43, J. Martin1, A. Márquez1
1Institute of Parasitology and Biomedicine López-Neyra, CSIC, Granada, Spain
2Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Vasculitis Research Unit, Department of Autoimmune Diseases, Barcelona, Spain
3Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
4Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
5University of Florence, Department of Biomedical Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio”, Florence, Italy
6Meyer Children’s Hospital IRCCS, Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Florence, Italy
7Hospital de la Princesa, IIS-Princesa, Department of Rheumatology, Madrid, Spain
8Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Autoimmune Systemic Diseases Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Barcelona, Spain
9McMaster University, Division of Rheumatology, Hamilton, Canada
10Cleveland Clinic, Department of Rheumatic and Immunologic Diseases, Cleveland, United States of America
11Mayo Clinic, Division of Rheumatology, Rochester, United States of America
12Referral Center for Systemic Autoimmune Diseases, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, Milan, Italy
13Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria S. Anna, University of Ferrara, Department of Rheumatology, Ferrara, Italy
14University of Trieste, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Trieste, Italy
15Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, Monash Medical Centre, Monash University, Department of Medicine, Melbourne, Australia
16University of Genova, Research Laboratory and Academic Division of Clinical Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Genova, Italy
17Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
18Klinik für Innere Medizin III, University-Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
19Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, Department of Rheumatology, St. Gallen, Switzerland
20Vasculitis Clinic, Klinikum Bad Bramstedt & University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein, Bad Bramstedt, Germany
21Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Erlangen, Germany
22Toulouse University Hospital Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Toulouse, France
23Hôpital Bichat, Université Paris-Cité, Service de Médecine Interne, Paris, France
24Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine & French Reference Center for Rare Auto-immune & Systemic Diseases, Paris, France
25Cochin Hospital, National Referral Center for Rare Autoimmune and Systemic Diseases, AP-HP, Université Paris Descartes, Department of Internal Medicine, Paris, France
26Oslo University Hospital, Department of Rheumatology, Oslo, Norway
27Akershus University Hospital, Department of Infectious Diseases, Oslo, Norway
28Amsterdam UMC, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Amsterdam, Netherlands
29University hospital Basel, Department of Rheumatology and Department of Clinical Research University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
30University Hospital Basel, Translational Immunology and Medical Outpatient Clinic, Departments of Biomedicine and Internal Medicine, Basel, Switzerland
31Centre for Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases, St Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin Academic Medical Centre, Department of Rheumatology, Dublin, Ireland
32University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Groningen, Netherlands
33School of Medicine, University of Leeds and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
34Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
35-, -, Spain
36-, -, United Kingdom
37-, -, United States of America
38University of Granada, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada ibs.GRANADA, Department of Medicine, Granada, Spain
39University of Lübeck, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Lübeck, Germany
40Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia and Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
41University of Pennsylvania, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Philadelphia, United States of America
42University of Pennsylvania, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Philadelphia, United States of America
43Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
44IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Division of Rheumatology, Madrid, Spain
45University of Cantabria, Department of Medicine, Santander, Spain

Background: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a large-vessel vasculitis, in which early diagnosis and treatment are essential. However, GCA presents highly heterogeneous disease manifestations and progression, posing a challenge for the early identification of severe symptoms. Genetic factors play a major role in this disease susceptibility, with the strongest and most consistent associations mapping to the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) region. Despite marked clinical heterogeneity of GCA, the contribution of HLA to specific clinical manifestations remains poorly characterized. Exploring how genetics relates to distinct clinical phenotypes may provide insights into disease mechanisms and support the development of personalized management strategies.


Objectives: The objective of this study was to identify HLA variants associated with clinical manifestations of GCA and integrate genetic biomarkers into a clinically-oriented framework.


Methods: HLA genetic variants from 3,498 patients with GCA and 15,550 healthy controls were imputed from previously collected genomic data [1] using the T1DGC reference panel comprising 8961 polymorphisms (including HLA SNPs, classical alleles, and amino acid variants). Patients with GCA were stratified according to the presence of clinical phenotypes (Table 1). Logistic regression analyses were performed for each trait, adjusting for the first 10 principal components and sex, comparing: i) manifestation-positive patients and controls, ii) manifestation-negative patients and controls, and iii) patients with and without the considered manifestation. A genetic signal was considered specifically associated with a clinical manifestation if it reached genome-wide significance (p<5×10 −8 ) in the manifestation-positive versus control analysis, showed no association in the manifestation-negative versus control comparison (p>0.05), and demonstrated a modest association in the intracase comparison (p<0.005). Conditional analyses were conducted to identify independent association signals.

All manifestation-specific HLA associations, together with previously identified non-HLA genetic associations [2], were integrated using latent class analysis (LCA) to identify subgroups of patients that share genetic characteristics (genetic classes). The optimal number of classes was determined based on the Bayesian Information Criterion and class assignment certainty. Finally, the clinical profiles of the genetic classes were characterized by comparing the prevalence of clinical manifestations across classes.


Results: Eleven significant specific associations were found with different clinical manifestations, involving 7 HLA variants and 8 clinical manifestations. Classical allele DQA1*0201 was found to be associated with an increased risk of jaw claudication (p=4.04x10 -12 ), later onset (p=4.39x10 -12 ) and cranial subtype (p=6.77x10 -11 ). In contrast, DQB1*0602 showed a protective effect for later onset (p=2.10x10 -19 ) and cranial GCA (p=9.58x10 -20 ). Independently, the rs5026743 variant also presented a protective effect for cranial GCA (p=2.72x10 -61 ). Regarding other manifestations, histidine at amino acid position 96 of the DRB1 molecule was found to confer protection specifically in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (p=7.15x10 -15 ). Other associations were identified with visual manifestations (rs204993, p=1.42x10 -10 ), permanent visual loss (rs9275602, p=1.21x10-8), irreversible occlusive disease (rs9275602, p=1.59x10 -10 ) and severe ischemic manifestations (rs3130286, p=5.97x10 -16 ). LCA integrating 7 HLA and 7 non-HLA genetic variants showed that genetic predisposition for clinical manifestations of GCA could be robustly summarized into 4 genetic classes, with 91.2% of individuals showing a predominant class with >90% certainty. GCA genetic classes showed significant differences in several clinical manifestations (Figure 1). Class 1 (n=853) showed a cranial-predominant profile, with higher prevalence of jaw claudication, headache, and severe ischemic manifestations. Class 2 (n=1,292) exhibited a heterogeneous pattern of cranial and extracranial features. Class 3 (n=516) displayed an extracranial-leaning profile, characterized by higher prevalence of polymyalgia rheumatica and limb claudication, and reduced visual manifestations. Class 4 (n=809) was enriched for ischemic features, including permanent visual loss, comprising a potentially high-risk genetic subgroup.


Conclusions: HLA genetic variation contributes to the clinical heterogeneity of giant cell arteritis by influencing susceptibility to specific disease features. Integration of manifestation-specific genetic associations identified four genetic classes with distinct clinical profiles. These results may facilitate the clinical translation of genetic advances in GCA. In particular, this study identified a high-risk genetic subgroup (class 4) characterized by severe ischemic and visual manifestations that are not necessarily preceded by milder or more easily detectable symptoms, and which,therefore, may benefit from closer monitoring and targeted follow-up strategies, pending validation in independent cohorts. Altogether, these results highlight the potential of integrating genetic biomarkers to support the development of more precise, genetically-informed approaches to patient stratification and management in GCA.

Clinical characteristics of the cohort of patients with giant cell arteritis.

Table 1.

Distribution of clinical manifestations by genetic class, shown as deviation from the cohort mean prevalence. *Significant correlation of the prevalence of the manifestation when comparing a specific class against all others (FDR < 0.05). JawC, jaw claudication; LimbC, limb claudication; IOD, irreversible occlusive disease; PMR, polymyalgia rheumatica; PVL, permanent vision loss; SIM, severe ischemic manifestations; VM, visual manifestations.


REFERENCES: [1] Borrego-Yaniz G, et al. Lancet Rheumatol. 2024; 6(6):e374-83.

[2] Borrego-Yaniz G, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2025; 84:386-7.


Acknowledgments: NIL.


Disclosure of Interests: None declared.


DOI: annrheumdis-2026-eular.A.768
Keywords: Autoimmunity, Epitranscriptomics, Epigenetics, And genetics, Biomarkers, -omics
Citation: , volume 85, supplement 1, year 2026, page s521
Session: Basic and Clinical Poster Tours: Across the vasculitis-verse (Poster Tours)