fetching data ...

POS0759 (2026)
FLIPPING THE SWITCH: COMPLEMENT ACTIVATION IN STILL’S DISEASE
Keywords: Innate immunity, -omics
F. Huijsmans1,2, A. Bodelón de Frutos2, G. Rogani2, L. Siebers2, J. F. Swart1, S. Benseler3,4, R. Yeung5,6, S. Vastert1,2, J. van Loosdregt2
1University Medical Center Utrecht, Pediatric Rheumatology & Immunology, Utrecht, Netherlands
2University Medical Center Utrecht, Center for Translational Immunology, Utrecht, Netherlands
3University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Canada
4Children’s Health Ireland, Rheumatology, Paediatrics, Dublin, Ireland
5The Hospital for Sick Children, Pediatrics, Immunology and Medical Science, Toronto, Canada
6University of Toronto, Immunology, Toronto, Canada

Background: Still’s disease (SD) is an autoinflammatory syndrome characterized by profound innate immune dysregulation. The complement system, a key component of innate immunity, can drive inflammatory cascades through the classical, lectin or alternative pathway. Despite its central role in inflammation, its involvement in SD remains poorly defined.


Objectives: To determine whether the complement pathway is activated in SD.


Methods: Complement activation was assessed through transcriptomic, proteomic, and in vitro stimulation assays. RNA sequencing was performed on sorted CD14+ monocytes from healthy donors (HD, n=6), active non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA, n=5), and SD patients across disease stages (onset n=13, remission n=11, macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) n = 2). In parallel, whole blood RNA from SD (active n=29, inactive n=26) and JIA patients (active n=639, inactive n=315) was analyzed by NanoString to quantify classical complement components C1QB and C1QC. Complement activation products (C1q, C3a, C5a, TCC) and inflammatory mediators (IL-18, CXCL9, CXCL10) were quantified using Luminex and ELISA. Functional classical complement activity was evaluated in sera of SD (active n=32, inactive n=66) and JIA patients (active n=12, inactive n=12). In vitro stimulation assays were conducted to identify stimuli inducing C1q expression in monocytes and to assess the effect of complement factors on CD8+ T cell activation.


Results: Gene set enrichment analysis of CD14 + monocytes from active SD patients compared with healthy donors revealed significant enrichment of the complement cascade, ranking among the top five upregulated pathways (hsa04160 Complement and coagulation cascades; NES = 2.3, padj < 0.01, 41 genes). More specifically, transcriptomic analyses demonstrated marked upregulation of classical complement components in active SD. Whole-blood NanoString analysis showed significantly higher C1q expression in active SD compared with inactive SD (median normalized counts: C1QB 30.4 vs 8.57, p <0.01; C1QC 15.1 vs 5.5, p <0.01) and active non-systemic JIA (C1QB 30.4 vs 10.6, p <0.01; C1QC 15.1 vs 6.03, p<0.01). Similarly, RNA-seq of CD14+ monocytes revealed increased C1q expression in active SD compared with inactive SD, active non-systemic JIA, and HDs. Notably, the highest C1q expression was observed in MAS patients (median C1QB normalized read counts: 463 [MAS; n=2] vs 202 [SD onset; n=13] vs 28 [SD remission; n=11]). At the protein level, active SD was characterized by significantly elevated C1q, C3a, C5a, and TCC, together with enhanced functional classical complement activity. Furthermore, whole-blood C1q gene expression positively correlated with markers of interferon signaling in active SD, including IL-18 (Spearman r = 0.50, p < 0.01), CXCL9 (r = 0.60, p < 0.01), and CXCL10 (r = 0.4, p = 0.0392). In vitro stimulation of healthy monocytes with IFN-γ robustly induced C1q expression, while exposure to C1q enhanced IFN-γ production by CD8 + T cells, suggesting a feed-forward inflammatory loop between C1q and type II IFN signaling.


Conclusions: Our findings indicate activation of the complement pathway in active SD, closely linked with type II IFN-signaling. Obtaining a better understanding of the role of the complement system, particularly the role of C1q-high monocytes, may open novel avenues for personalized therapeutic approaches in SD.


REFERENCES: NIL.


Acknowledgments: NIL.


Disclosure of Interests: Freya Huijsmans: None declared, Alejandra Bodelón de Frutos: None declared, Greta Rogani: None declared, Lyanne Siebers: None declared, Joost F. Swart: None declared, Susanne Benseler: None declared, Rae Yeung: None declared, Sebastian Vastert Consultant: Sobi and Novartis, Research Grant: Sobi, Jorg van Loosdregt: None declared


DOI: annrheumdis-2026-eular.A.1505
Keywords: Innate immunity, -omics
Citation: , volume 85, supplement 1, year 2026, page s895
Session: Poster View III (Poster View)