fetching data ...

AB0667 (2024)
THE EFFICACY OF FILGOTINIB IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS MAY BE TIME-DEPENDENT. (IN VIEW OF THE HILL COEFFICIENT OF FILGOTINIB)
Keywords: Disease-modifying Drugs (DMARDs), Targeted synthetic drugs
T. Yoshikawa1,2, T. Abe1, M. Tamura1, T. Furukawa1, T. Hashimoto1, N. Azuma1, K. Matsui1
1School of Medicine, Hyogo Medical University, Department of Diabetes Endocrinology and Clinical Immunology, Nishinomiya City, Japan
2Amagasaki Chuo Hospital, Division of Internal Medicine, Amagasaki City, Japan

Background: Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) represent a novel class of oral targeted disease-modifying drugs, heralding a recent revolution in the therapeutic landscape for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other immune-mediated conditions. These inhibitors, which can complement or even replace conventional and biological drugs, operate through a distinctive mechanism involving intracellular disruption of the JAK-STAT pathway—a pivotal player in the immune response. The Hill coefficient (H) serves to describe the sigmoidicity of a drug’s concentration-response curve. When H > 2.0, a “time-dependent” effect is observed, where the critical factor is not the peak drug concentration but the crossing of a threshold beneath which the effect becomes negligible. The prolonged serum concentration above this threshold correlates with a more pronounced effect. Conversely, when H < 2.0, a “concentration-dependent” effect emerges, with the peak concentration holding significance [1]. In the report by Chimalakonda A et al [2], the H for the inhibitory effect of JAK1/3 in tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib ranged from 1.0-1.3. For JAK1 inhibition in filgotinib (FIL), the H was nearly 2 [3]. Intriguingly, in a phase II study, FIL at 100 mg BID demonstrated a tendency to be more effective than FIL at 200 mg QD after 12 weeks of treatment [4]. However, the time-dependency of FIL’s effect on rheumatoid arthritis remains unclear.


Objectives: The objective of this investigation is to assess whether the impact of FIL on rheumatoid arthritis exhibits time-dependent characteristics.


Methods: This constituted a retrospective, observational study involving 25 patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who met the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR classification criteria. These patients were prescribed FIL and underwent a minimum 12-week follow-up at our hospital from November 2020 to October 2023. The efficacy of FIL was assessed based on the EULAR response at 12-week treatment, with concurrent measurement of the change in DAS28-CRP. Patients were categorized into three groups based on renal function and FIL dosage: FIL 200 mg group [FIL200], FIL 100 mg with chronic kidney disease (CKD) (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m 2 ) [FIL100CKD], and FIL 100 mg without CKD [FIL100].


Results: The median age of the patients was 69.0 years (IQR: 61.0-76.0), and the median disease duration was 156 months (102-180). The median DAS28-CRP was 3.60 (3.16-4.49). Comparing the FIL100CKD group to the FIL200 group, the former exhibited a higher median age (80.0 vs. 73.0 year, P<0.05). However, other patient backgrounds showed no statistically significant differences. No significant variations were observed in the number of concomitant MTX, other csDMARDs, or prednisolone among the three groups. But, there was a tendency towards fewer patients being biologics- and JAKi-naive in the FIL200 group (FIL100 group; 60.0%, FIL100CKD group; 66.7% and FIL200 group; 14.3%, respectively). In terms of treatment outcomes, the EULAR response and ΔDAS28-CRP at 12 weeks tended to be higher in the FIL100, FIL100CKD, and FIL200 groups, in that sequential order (Figure 1).


Conclusion: FIL exhibits a Hill coefficient close to 2, implying a time-dependent pharmacodynamic effect rather than concentration dependence. In cases with eGFR <60, the time above IC5 for JAK1 is extended (FIL100; approximately 6 hours, FIL100CKD; approximately 8 hours, FIL200; approximately 9.5 hours) [5,6]. Clinical data derived from the current study imply that the efficacy of FIL is time-dependent. Further studies are needed to confirm this.


REFERENCES: [1] Czock D, Keller F. J Pharmacokinet Phar. 2007;34(6):727–51.

[2] Chimalakonda A, et al. Dermatology Ther. 2021;11(5):1763–76.

[3] Namour F, et al. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2015;54(8):859–74.

[4] Westhovens R, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(6):998.

[5] Namour F, et al. Brit J Clin Ph REFERENCES armaco. 2018;84(12):2779–89.

[6] Veeravalli V, et al. Drug Safety. 2020;1–15.

12W EULAR response


Acknowledgements: NIL.


Disclosure of Interests: None declared.


DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2024-eular.990
Keywords: Disease-modifying Drugs (DMARDs), Targeted synthetic drugs
Citation: , volume 83, supplement 1, year 2024, page 1620
Session: Rheumatoid arthritis (Publication Only)