fetching data ...

AB0966 (2024)
UVEITIS IN AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS: STUDY OF 309 PATIENTS IN A SINGLE UNIVERSITY CENTER
Keywords: Biological DMARD, Uveitis
L. Martin-Sierra1, L. Sanchez-Bilbao2, J. Rueda-Gotor3, V. Calvo-Río2, Á. Egea-Fuentes4, A. Herrero-Morant2, I. Gonzalez-Mazon2, J. Muñoz-Rodríguez5, R. Blanco2
1Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, Rheumatology, Ciudad Real, Spain
2Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Rheumatology, Santander, Spain
3Hospital de Sierrallana, Rheumatology, Torrelavega, Spain
4Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Rheumatology, Murcia, Spain
5Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, Unidad de Investigación Traslacional de la Gerencia de Atención Integrada de Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain

Background: Uveitis is a frequent extraarticular manifestation of axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA), specifically anterior uveitis. Effects of biological therapy on uveitis associated to axSpA are poorly understood.


Objectives: To assess in axSpA a ) the frequency of uveitis and clinical features; b ) its association with axSpA activity, c ) effectiveness of synthetic disease-modifying drugs and biological therapy and, d ) frequency of ocular surface pathology.


Methods: A retrospective longitudinal study from a cohort of 309 unselected patients with axSpA classified according to the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria. All patients were diagnosed and managed uniformly in a single university centre. Uveitis was diagnosed by ophthalmologist. Sociodemographic data, clinical features, disease activity and treatments were collected. Incidence of uveitis was calculated before and after treatments initiation, reported as exposure adjusted incidence rate (EAIR) per 100 patient-years of biological drug exposure.


Results: Uveitis was observed in 50 patients (21 women/29 men) out of 309 (16.2%) and ocular surface pathology in 8 (2.7%). Demographic and clinical features in patients who developed ocular pathology and specifically uveitis and those who did not are summarized in Table 1. Uveitis was acute in all cases, anterior (98%), unilateral (72%), unilateral alternate (28%) and recurrent (70%). Ocular surface pathology was episcleritis (75%), scleritis (12.5%) and corneal ulcer (12.5%). Patients with uveitis had a greater frequency of positive HLA-B27 (88% p<0.001) and severe sacroilitis (56% p=0.03) than patients without uveitis. Activity indexes (BASDAI, ASDAS) were similar regardless ocular involvement. Biological DMARDs were used in 24 (48%) patients with uveitis; 22(44%) of them received anti-TNFα monoclonal antibodies, etanercept (ETN) 4 (2%), secukinumab (SECU) 12 (24%) and JAK inhibitors (JAKi) 7 (14%). The EAIR of uveitis before treatment with sulfasalazine (SLZ) was 13.06 episodes/100 patients-year, with monoclonal anti-TNFα developed 1.76 episodes/100 patients-year, with SECU 1.35 episodes/100 patients/year and with JAKi 6.97 episodes/100 patients/year. After treatment, patients treated with SLZ, monoclonal anti-TNFα and JAKi developed 4.15, 1.47 and 2.35 episodes/100 patients/years, respectively, while in those treated with SECU was 3.15 episodes/100 patients/year.


Conclusion: Uveitis was observed in 16.2% of axSpA, while ocular pathology surface in 2.7%. Most patients with uveitis had positive HLA-B27 and severe sacroilitis in x-ray was more frequent. The most frequent pattern of uveitis observed in axSpA was acute, anterior and unilateral. The uveitis exposure adjusted incidence rate decreased with SLZ, antiTNFα monoclonal antibodies and JAKi and increased with SECU.

General features of 309 patients with axSpA and differences between patients with and without ocular involvement and uveitis.

Overal (n=309 ) Ocular involvement (n=55 ) Non-ocular involvement (n=254 ) p value Uveitis (n=50 ) Non-uveitis (n=259 ) p value
Age (years), mean±SD 53.17±11.66 53.37±10.24 53,12±11.98 0.72 53.63±10.51 53.07±11.90 0.56
Sex (women/men), n (% of women) 127/182 (41.1) 24/31 (43.6) 103/151 (40.6%) 0.67 21/29 (42) 106/153 (40.9) 0.88
HLA-B27positive 197 (64) 46 (83.6) 151 (59.7) 0.001 44 (88) 153 (59.3) <0.001
Inflamatory back pain 291 (96.7) 54 (98.2) 237 (96.3) 0.49 49 (98) 242 (96.4) 0.56
Peripheral arthritis 106 (34.3) 18 (32.7) 88 (34.6) 0.78 16 (32) 90 (34.7) 0.70
Psoriasis 38 (12.3) 6 (10.9) 32 (12.6) 0.72 6 (12) 32 (12.4) 0.94
Inflammatory Bowel disease 26 (8.4) 5 (9.1) 21 (8,3) 0.84 4 (8) 22 (8.5) 0.90
Ocular surface pathology 8 (2.6) 8 (14.5) 0 (0) 0.00 3 (6) 5 (2) 0.10
BASDAI, mean±SD 3.67±2.13 3.42±2.27 3.72±2.10 0.39 3.51±2.25 3.70±2.11 0.64
ASDAS, mean±SD 2.28±0.97 2.09±0.97 2.32±0.97 0.22 2.13±0.93 2.31±0.98 0.38
Severe sacroiliitis (grade 3,4), n(%) 132 (42.7) 30 (54.5) 102 (40.2) 0.05 28 (56) 104 (40.2) 0.03
Sacroilitis on MRI (ASAS criteria) (n%) 148 (47.9) 23 (41.8) 125 (51) 0.21 19 (38) 129 (51.6) 0.07

Uveitis exposure adjusted incidence rate before and after biological therapy


REFERENCES: NIL.


Acknowledgements: NIL.


Disclosure of Interests: None declared.


DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2024-eular.6139
Keywords: Biological DMARD, Uveitis
Citation: , volume 83, supplement 1, year 2024, page 1796
Session: Spondyloarthritis (Publication Only)