fetching data ...

OP0091 (2024)
INTERLEUKIN (IL)-16 IN PLASMA AND URINE IN ANTI – NEUTROPHIL CYTOPLASMIC ANTIBODY (ANCA)-ASSOCIATED VASCULITIS
Keywords: Cytokines and Chemokines, Biomarkers, Kidneys
A. Juto1,2, F. Faustini1,2, A. Häyry1, A. Larsson3, V. Malmström1, A. Bruchfeld4,5,6, A. Antovic1,2, V. Oke1,7, I. Gunnarsson1,2
1Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Stockholm, Sweden
2Karolinska University Hospital, Rheumatology, Stockholm, Sweden
3Department of Medical Sciences, Clinical Chemistry, Akademiska Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
4Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Department of Health, Linköping, Sweden
5Karolinska University Hospital, Department of Renal Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden
6Karolinska Institutet, CLINTEC, Stockholm, Sweden
7Academic Specialist Center, Center for Rheumatology, Stockholm, Sweden

Background: The pro-inflammatory interleukin (IL)-16 has been implicated in various rheumatic disorders. Urinary (u-) IL-16 has been associated with proliferative nephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and is also expressed in inflammatory foci in the kidney [1]. Nevertheless, there is a lack of data on plasma (p-) and u-IL-16 in other immune-mediated kidney diseases including antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV).


Objectives: To determine the IL-16 (p- and u-) levels in a cross-sectional cohort of AAV patients compared to controls and to assess associations with clinical variables.


Methods: P- and u-IL-16 were measured using a commercial sandwich ELISA. The cut-off for detection was set to ≥ 10 pg/mL. Disease activity was assessed using the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS). Kidney biopsies were classified according to histopathological class [2]. Immunohistochemical staining of IL-16 in kidney biopsies was performed. Healthy controls were included for comparison (plasma n=38 and urine n=48).


Results: There were 87 AAV patients included in the study, 47 (54%) males, 57 (65.5 %) anti-PR3 positive and 30 (34.5 %) anti-MPO positive whereas 63 (72.4 %) patients had GPA and 24 (27.6 %) MPA. There were 66 (76%) patients with active disease (BVAS >0, median 14, range 23) and 39 (44.8%) had kidney involvement. All patients had detectable p-IL-16 levels. U-IL-16 was found in 18 (21%) AAV patients, 15 with active disease and kidney involvement, 1 active disease without kidney involvement, and 2 in remission with prior kidney involvement. Two controls had detectable u-IL-16. Active patients had higher levels of p- and u-IL-16 compared to controls (median 364.7 pg/ml vs 254.5 pg/ml, U = 911.0, p = 0.021 and median (range) 0 (220.8) pg/ml vs 0 (17.8) pg/ml, U = 1258, p = 0.003), but there was no difference between patients in remission and controls, Figure 1. U-IL-16 significantly correlated with BVAS (r s = 0.365, p<0.001). Both p- and u-IL-16 correlated with eGFR (r s = - 0.283, p = 0.022 and r s = - 0.347, p = 0.005) in active patients and u-IL-16 also correlated with urine albumin-creatinine ratio (r s = 0.336, p=0.009). Active patients with kidney involvement had higher levels of u-IL-16 compared to patients without (median(range) 0 (220.8) pg/ml vs 0 (67.4) pg/ml, U = 349.0, p = 0.002), but no differences in p-IL-16 levels were seen between groups. There were no differences in levels of p- or u-IL-16 in active patients with ongoing immunosuppression compared to those without. Furthermore p- or u-IL-16 levels did not differ between diagnosis (GPA/MPA) or ANCA-serotype. Kidney biopsies were obtained from 43 patients. P-IL-16 levels correlated negatively with the percentage of normal glomeruli (r s = - 0.311, p = 0.043) and u-IL-16 levels positively with the percentage of crescentic glomeruli (r s = 0.329, p = 0.031). Thirty-seven kidney biopsies were classified according to histopathological type: Focal (n=20), Crescentic (n=8), Mixed (n=6), and Sclerotic (n=3). There was a significant difference in u-IL-16 levels between these groups (H(3) = 8.68, p = 0.034) with the highest u-IL-16 levels in the crescentic and sclerotic classes. A pilot staining of kidney biopsies showed detectable IL-16 in the interstitium and inflammatory infiltrates.


Conclusion: The increased u- IL-16 levels found in AAV patients with active disease and kidney involvement strongly imply a role in the inflammatory kidney process. Moreover, IL-16 was expressed in the kidney tissue and urine levels reflected the severity of kidney involvement which strengthens the findings. The results suggest that urine IL-16 could be used as a biomarker of kidney involvement, as previously shown in severe types of lupus nephritis.


REFERENCES: [1] Hayry A, et al. Interleukin (IL) 16: a candidate urinary biomarker for proliferative lupus nephritis. Lupus Sci Med. 2022;9(1).

[2] Berden AE, et al. Histopathologic classification of ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21(10):1628-36.


Acknowledgements: NIL.


Disclosure of Interests: Anna Juto: None declared, Francesca Faustini: None declared, Aliisa Häyry: None declared, Anders Larsson: None declared, Vivianne Malmström: None declared, Annette Bruchfeld Alexion, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chemocetryx, Fresenius, CSL-Vifor (during the last three years)., Alexion, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chemocetryx, Fresenius, CSL-Vifor (during the last three years)., Aleksandra Antovic: None declared, Vilija Oke: None declared, Iva Gunnarsson: None declared.


DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2024-eular.3953
Keywords: Cytokines and Chemokines, Biomarkers, Kidneys
Citation: , volume 83, supplement 1, year 2024, page 36
Session: Basic Abstract Sessions: New mechanisms in vasculitis and PMR (Oral Abstract Presentations)