fetching data ...

ABS0165 (2025)
PROVISIONAL EXPERT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF FECAL INCONTINENCE IN SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS: A REPORT FROM WORLD SCLERODERMA FOUNDATION (WSF) GASTROINTESTINAL “AD HOC COMMITTEE”
Keywords: Gastrointestinal tract, Diagnostic test, Quality of life, Imaging
Z. McMahan1, M. C. De Santis2, A. Lo Cricchio2, L. Alcala-Gonzalez3, J. Clarke4, A. O’Connor5,6, S. Bellando-Randone7, C. Denton8, I. Galetti9,10, A. Lescoat11,12, M. Matucci-Cerinic13,14, P. Matucci Cerinic15, J. Mclaughlin16, C. Murray17, E. R. Volkmann18, A. Alunno19, G. Bandini2, M. Hughes20,21
1UTHealth Houston, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Houston Texas, United States of America
2University of Florence, and Carggi Hospital, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, Florence, Italy
3Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Digestive System Research Unit, Digestive Diseases Department, Barcelona, Spain
4Stanford University School of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Palo Alto, 300 Pasteur Drive Room H0206B, CA, MC 5244, Standford, United States of America
5Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Manchester, United Kingdom
6The University of Manchester, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
7AOU Careggi, University of Florence, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Scleroderma Unit, Florence, Italy
8UCL Medical School Royal Free Campus, Centre for Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Diseases, London, United Kingdom
9FESCA (Federation of European Scleroderma Associations), Saint Maur, Belgium
10GILS (Gruppo Italiano, Lotta alla Sclerodermia), Milan, Italy
11University of Rennes CHU Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset -Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail-UMRS, Rennes, France
12CHU Rennes, Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Rennes, France
13IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Unit of Immunology, Rheumatology, Allergy and Rare diseases (UnIRAR), & Inflammation, fibrosis and ageing initiative (INFLAGE), Milan, Italy
14Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
15University of Udine, Division of Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Udine, Italy
16The University of Manchester and Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford Care Organisation, Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, United Kingdom
17Cleveland Clinic London, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, London, United Kingdom
18University of California, David Geffen School of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Los Angeles, California, Italy
19University of L’Aquila, Department of Life Health and Environmental Sciences, Internal Medicine and Nephrology Division, ASL1 Avezzano-Sulmona-L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
20The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Manchester, United Kingdom
21Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford Care Organisation, Salford, Department of Rheumatology, Salford, United Kingdom

Background: Fecal incontinence affects over 50% of patients with systemic sclerosis and has a major impact on morbidity and mortality. Often, given the complexity of patients with SSc, patients are directed back to rheumatologists for the management of their gastrointestinal issues. As a result, it is important for rheumatologists to have guidance on how to approach the assessment and management of this debilitating issue.


Objectives: To produce ‘real-world’ recommendations for the assessment and management of fecal incontinence in patients with SSc.


Methods: An international, multidisciplinary Steering Board (SB) was assembled consisting of clinicians (rheumatology, gastroenterology and GI surgeons), and with expert methodological expertise, and patient representation. Initial recommendations were drafted/agreed by the SB based on a comprehensive literature review and expert opinion. An online voting round was conducted to decide on whether items should be accepted (≥75% SB agreement).


Results: There was a good response/completion rate for the provisional recommendations (n=12/18, 67%). The majority (21/22, 95%) of recommendations received final approval for inclusion. We currently present the approved recommendations for the assessment and management of fecal incontinence in systemic sclerosis.

Overarching principles

  • Consider asking patients about FI throughout the course of SSc, although SSc-FI is more likely in patients with a longer disease duration. (100%)

  • In patients with SSc-FI, an experienced multi-disciplinary team, including colleagues from rheumatology, gastroenterology, dieticians/nutritionists, specialist nursing, pelvic PT, and/or GI surgery, should be involved in management. (100%)

  • Upon assessment, the psychosocial, social, and economic impacts of SSc-FI should be considered and strategically addressed. (100%)

  • Clinical Assessment

  • A comprehensive history is essential in the initial assessment of all patients with SSc-FI. (100%)

  • A structured and detailed interview is required to identify and classify the type of FI: (100%)

  • In patients with SSc-FI, screen for and treat co-existing diarrhoea, if present. (100%)

  • Address the underlying cause(s) of diarrhea – scleroderma and non-scleroderma-related

    Consider mechanisms that might impact treatment choice (e.g., SIBO, bile acid malabsorption)

  • Determine whether prolapse is present and whether there is a relationship with the onset of FI symptoms. (100%)

  • Gather evidence of pelvic floor weakness which may contribute to FI, such as history of vaginal deliveries and/or pelvic surgeries. (91.7%)

  • Assess diet, medications, and other potential environmental contributors. (100%)

  • Objective investigations should be tailored to the patient based on the comprehensive clinical assessment and likely mechanistic driver/s of SSc-FI. (100%)

  • Interventions

  • Identify and treat contributing factors. When diarrhea co-exists, controlling diarrheal symptoms should be the initial priority. (100%)

  • In patients with FI in the context of bloating and diarrhea, a trial of probiotics may be considered (66.7%)

  • High-impact, low-cost, non-pharmacological management strategies are important first-line interventions in all patients with SSc-FI (100%)

  • Consider the role of nutritional modifications where relevant. (100%)

  • Consider and prioritize pelvic physical therapy upfront for SSc-FI attributable to pelvic floor weakness before testing, as patients often improve and risk is minimal (if any) (100%)

  • If overflow diarrhea is the issue and slow colonic transit is present, consider a trial of prokinetics (e.g., prucalopride or pyridostigmine). (83.3%)

  • If slow colonic transit is not an issue, consider a trial of other medications (e.g., secretagogues, such as linaclotide, lubiprostone, plecanatide) to help alleviate stool burden. (75%)

  • Transanal irrigation may be considered in selected patients with passive SSc-FI (83.3%)

  • Medications that slow bowel motility are not recommended for the management of SSc-FI, including opioid-based medications, as they predispose to pseudo-obstruction and should be used sparingly in SSc. Some patients report benefits from limited as-needed use of anti-diarrheal medications (e.g., for social functions) (91.7%)

  • There is currently no role for the generalized use of immunosuppression for SSc-FI. (91.7%)

  • Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation may be helpful in some patients with refractory SSc-FI and is generally well-tolerated. Other minimally invasive procedures for SSc-FI are not currently recommended (83.3%)

  • Surgery should be considered as a last resort for SSc-FI patients with severe refractory symptoms (100%)


  • Conclusion: We present provisional recommendations for the evaluation and management of fecal incontinence in SSc. Only minimal refinement and voting is required to finalize these practical recommendations. Our collegiate approach will provide guidance for clinical practice and also inform a future research agenda.


    REFERENCES: [1] Bandini G, et al Significant gastrointestinal unmet needs in patients with systemic sclerosis: insights from a large international patient survey. Rheumatology 2024;3:e92–3.

    [2] Lescoat A, Zimmermann F, Murray CD, Khanna D, Hughes M, McMahan ZH. Systemic sclerosis-related fecal incontinence: a scoping review focusing on a neglected manifestation. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024 Dec 18:keae691.


    Acknowledgements: This work was supported by the WSF Gastrointestinal ad hoc committee.


    Disclosure of Interests: Zsuzsanna McMahan: None declared. Maria Cristina De Santis: None declared. Anna Lo Cricchio: None declared. Luis Alcala-Gonzalez: None declared. John Clarke: None declared. Alexander O’Connor: None declared. Silvia Bellando-Randone: None declared. Christopher Denton: None declared. Ilaria Galetti: None declared. Alain Lescoat: None declared. Marco Matucci-Cerinic: None declared. Pietro Matucci Cerinic: None declared. John Mclaughlin: None declared. Charles Murray: None declared. Elizabeth R Volkmann Boehringer Ingelheim (Unbranded, disease state), AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Astrazeneca, Atyr Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Horizon, Kadmon, Prometheus, Alessia Alunno: None declared. Giulia Bandini: None declared. Michael Hughes: None declared.

    © The Authors 2025. This abstract is an open access article published in Annals of Rheumatic Diseases under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ). Neither EULAR nor the publisher make any representation as to the accuracy of the content. The authors are solely responsible for the content in their abstract including accuracy of the facts, statements, results, conclusion, citing resources etc.


    DOI: annrheumdis-2025-eular.A2040
    Keywords: Gastrointestinal tract, Diagnostic test, Quality of life, Imaging
    Citation: , volume 84, supplement 1, year 2025, page 2272
    Session: Systemic sclerosis (Publication Only)