fetching data ...

ABS0566 (2025)
STRONG CORRELATION BETWEEN SLEDAI AND SLE-DAS IN THE SPANISH POPULATION: ASSESSMENT OF DISCORDANT PATIENTS
Keywords: Outcome measures, Descriptive Studies
E. Heras-Recuero1, A. A. García Fernández1, T. Blázquez-Sánchez1, C. Gómez-Moreno5, I. Ferraz-Amaro2, J. Llorca3, M. Á. González-Gay1,4
1Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Division of Rheumatology, Madrid, Spain
2Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Division of Rheumatology, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
3University of Cantabria; Santander, CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP) and Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Santander, Spain
4University of Cantabria, Medicine and Psychiatry Department, Santander, Spain
5Autonomous University Madrid, Fundacion Jiménez Díaz School of Nursing, Madrid, Spain

Background: Assessing disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is essential for effective treatment. SLEDAI-2K uses dichotomous items, while SLE-DAS incorporates both dichotomous and continuous variables.


Objectives: To analyze the correlation between SLEDAI-2K and SLE-DAS in SLE patients from central Spain and analyze factors leading to discordance in disease activity classification.


Methods: Retrospective assessment of 324 SLE patients followed up from 2010 to 2024 at Madrid’s Fundación Jiménez Díaz Hospital (Spain). Data were collected from the patients’ most recent visits and disease activity was evaluated using SLEDAI-2K and SLE-DAS, and discordant classifications between the tools were analyzed.


Results: The number of patients in each disease activity category was as follows: Remission (SLEDAI-2K 0, n=180 [55.6%] vs. SLE-DAS 0.37, n=180 [55.6%]); Low activity (SLEDAI 2K 1-5, n=126 [38.9%] vs. SLE-DAS ≤2.08, n=86 [26.5%]); Moderate (SLEDAI-2K 6-10, n=15 [4.6%] vs. SLE-DAS >2.08 ≤7.64, n=10 [3.1%]); Severe (SLEDAI-2K 11-19, n=3 [0.9%] vs. SLE-DAS >7.64, n=3 [0.9%]). SLEDAI-2K and SLE-DAS showed strong correlation (ρ=0.970, p<0.001), with high concordance (linearly weighted Kappa index=0.8004, p< 0.001). Forty-five patients were discordant in terms of disease activity categorization. Of these, 42 were discordant at only one level of disease activity. Notably, in 43 of the 45 discordant cases, SLE-DAS classified patients as having a higher degree of disease activity compared to SLEDAI-2K. Patients with skin and hematological manifestations were more commonly discordant in terms of disease activity (Tables 1 and 2).


Conclusion: SLEDAI-2K and SLE-DAS demonstrate a strong correlation and high reproducibility for assessing disease activity in the Spanish population. However, SLE-DAS offers additional information, particularly in patients with hematologic and skin involvement, enabling a more precise evaluation of disease activity in SLE patients.


REFERENCES: NIL.

Table 1. Clinical characteristics of 126 patients classified as having low disease activity according to SLEDAI-2K.

Multivariate analysis to identify predictors of discordant evaluation of disease activity when SLEDAI-2K and SLE-DAS were applied.

OR CI 95% p value
Skin (ref. absence) 4.8 (1.11-20-91) 0.036*
Hematological (ref. absence) 3.3 (0.96-11.39) 0.059
Age at diagnosis, years 1.03 (0.99-1.07) 0.193
Glucocorticoid use (ref. no use) 2.93 (0.86-10.04) 0.086
Biologic therapies (ref. no use) 3.37 (0.98-11.61) 0.054
anti-sdDNA (ref. negative) 0.34 (0.11-1.0) 0.069
Antiphospholipid syndrome (ref. absence) 2.14 (0.41-11.18) 0.368
SDI (ref. value) 1.41 (0.74-2.68) 0.302
LLDAS (ref. no use) 0.01 (0.00-0.14) <0.001*

LLDAS, Lupus Low Disease Activity State; SDI, SLICC/ACR damage index; anti-sdDNA, anti-(double stranded)-DNA antibodies


Acknowledgements: NIL.


Disclosure of Interests: None declared.

© The Authors 2025. This abstract is an open access article published in Annals of Rheumatic Diseases under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ). Neither EULAR nor the publisher make any representation as to the accuracy of the content. The authors are solely responsible for the content in their abstract including accuracy of the facts, statements, results, conclusion, citing resources etc.


DOI: annrheumdis-2025-eular.B2120
Keywords: Outcome measures, Descriptive Studies
Citation: , volume 84, supplement 1, year 2025, page 2215
Session: Systemic lupus erythematosus (Publication Only)