fetching data ...

ABS1044 (2025)
A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW TO INFORM THE 2025 EULAR RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT OF POLYMYALGIA RHEUMATICA AND LARGE VESSEL VASCULITIS: MANAGEMENT OF DISEASE INCLUDING RELAPSE AND COMPLICATIONS
Keywords: Targeted synthetic drugs, Systematic review, Randomised controlled trial, Biological DMARD
M. Dey5, D. P. Misra8, A. Bartoletti7, G. Ducker2, S. Monti1, B. Hellmich3, C. Mukhtyar2, P. Studenic4,6, E. Nikiphorou9
1IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Immunorheumatology Research Laboratory, Milan, Italy
2Norwich and Norfolk University Hospitals NHS Trust, Rheumatology, Norwich, United Kingdom
3Klinik für Innere Medizin, Rheumatologie und Immunologie, Medius Kliniken, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Universität Tübingen, Rheumatologie und Immunologie, Tübingen, Germany
4Medical University of Vienna, Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Vienna, Austria
5Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
6Karolinska Institutet, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine (Solna), Stockholm, Sweden
7IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Rheumatology, Pavia, Italy
8Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Lucknow, India
9King’s College London, London, United Kingdom

Background: EULAR recommendations informing the management of Polymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR) and Large Vessel Vasculitis (LVV) were previously published separately in 2015 [1] and 2020 [2] respectively. Newly-emerging evidence has necessitated a comprehensive update.


Objectives: To conduct a systematic review to inform the 2025 EULAR recommendations for PMR and LVV.


Methods: This systematic review (PROSPERO registration: CRD42024560403), performed on 19th June 2024 on MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL searched for literature on adult patients with PMR, Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) or Takayasu arteritis (TAK), using MeSH terms for pharmacological and non-pharmacological management. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies, published since 1st April 2014 (for PMR) or 31st December 2017 (for LVV), without language limitations. Abstracts presented at EULAR 2024 and ACR 2024 were hand-searched specifically for any RCT data, also looking to identify related full-manuscript publications following the end-date of the systematic review search. Studies were assessed for their qulity using relevant Risk of Bias (RoB) tools for RCTs/observational studies (Cochrane Risk of Bias 2/Newcastle Ottawa Scale).


Results: After deduplication and full-text screening, 128 articles were included (26 RCTs) (Figure 1), along with 4 RCTs from ACR & EULAR 2024 abstracts. RCTs of GCA (low RoB) reported superiority of secukinumab (Phase-2, n=1), mavrilimumab (Phase-2, n=1) and upadacitinib (Phase-3, n=1) vs placebo; Phase-2 trials of sarilumab (n=1) and sirukumab (n=1) were prematurely terminated (high RoB). The two RCTs of sariliumab and sirukumab in GCA were at high risk of bias due to their premature termination due to which no inferences could be drawn about their effectiveness. Secondary analyses from the GiACTA trial reported similar efficacy of tocilizumab versus placebo in those with cranial symptoms, PMR symptoms, or both cranial & PMR symptoms, and better improvements in SF-36 and fatigue scores with tocilizumab than placebo. RCTs of TAK reported similar effectiveness of methotrexate or mycophenolate (unclear RoB), and superiority of adalimumab vs tocilizumab (high RoB). Phase-3 RCTs in PMR revealed superiority of tocilizumab and sarilumab (low RoB) vs. placebo while smaller phase-2 studies provided initial evidence for efficacy of rituximab (low RoB) and abatacept (unclear RoB) vs placebo (Table 1). A RCT showed similar efficacy of tofacitinib or glucocorticoids in PMR although this study was at high risk of bias.


Conclusion: The systematic review identified several new Phase-2 and Phase-3 RCTs about the efficacy and safety of IL-6i, IL-17i, Janus kinase inhibitors and B-cell depletion therapies in GCA and PMR. High quality adequately sized RCTs in TAK are still lacking. This evidence was used to inform the 2025 EULAR recommendations for management of Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Large Vessel Vasculitis.


REFERENCES: [1] Dejaco C, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Oct;74(10):1799-807.

[2] Hellmich B, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jan;79(1):19-30.

PRISMA flowchart

Low Risk of Bias RCTs* of patients with GCA or PMR

Disease, Population (treatment-naïve/ relapsing) Author Year Intervention (n) Comparator (n) Primary outcome Results Conclusion
GCA: treatment-naïve and relapsing Cid 2022 MAV (n=42) PBO(n=28) Time to flare (ITT) HR 0.38 (0.15-0.92) MAV superior to PBO
Venhoff 2023 SEC(n=27) PBO (n=25) Sustained remission (28w, ITT) RD 0.50 (0.29 - 0.67) RR 3.43 (2.10 - 5.87) SEC superior to PBO
PMR: treatment-naive Cutolo 2017 MR PRED (n=32) IR PRED (n=30) Complete response rate (4w, PP) RD 12.22 (95%CI -15.82% to 40.25%) did not met non-inferiority criteria (-15%). MR PRED similar to IR PRED.
Bonelli 2022 TOC (n=19) PBO (n=17) GC-free remission (16w) OR 12.9 (2.2-73.6) TOC superior to PBO
PMR: treatment-naïve and relapsing Marsman 2021 RTX Single dose 1000 mg (n=23) PBO (n=24) GC-free remission (21w) RD (one sided 95%CI): 27 (4) % RR: 2.3 (1.1) RTX superior to PBO
Devauchelle-Pensec 2022 TOC (n=49) PBO (n=51) CRP PMR- AS <10 with PRED≤5 mg/day/ reduction in PRED dose ≥10 mg/day (w24, ITT) RR 2.3 (1.5-3.6) TOC superior to PBO
PMR: Relapsing Spiera 2023 SAR (n=59) PBO (n=58) Sustained remission (52w) SAR 28%, PBO 10% SAR superior to PBO

*From full published manuscripts

CRP. -C-reactive protein, GC – Glucocorticoid, HR – Hazard ratio, IR – Immediate release, ITT – Intention to treat, MAV – Mavrilimumab, OR – Odds ratio, PBO – Placebo, PP – Per protocol, PRED – Prednisone, MPRED – Methylprednisolone, MR – Modified release, PMR-AS - PMR activity score, RD - Risk difference, RR – Risk ratio, RTX – Rituximab, SAR – Sarilumab, SEC – Secukinumab, TOC – Tocilizumab


Acknowledgements: Funding was received from EULAR.


Disclosure of Interests: None declared.

© The Authors 2025. This abstract is an open access article published in Annals of Rheumatic Diseases under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ). Neither EULAR nor the publisher make any representation as to the accuracy of the content. The authors are solely responsible for the content in their abstract including accuracy of the facts, statements, results, conclusion, citing resources etc.


DOI: annrheumdis-2025-eular.B451
Keywords: Targeted synthetic drugs, Systematic review, Randomised controlled trial, Biological DMARD
Citation: , volume 84, supplement 1, year 2025, page 2353
Session: Vasculitis, large vessels including polymyalgia rheumatica (Publication Only)