fetching data ...

POS0032 (2025)
Effectiveness of Switching from IL-6 Inhibitors to Other Targeted Molecular Therapies
Keywords: Observational studies/ registry, Biological DMARD
T. Okano1, K. Mamoto1, Y. Yamada1, T. Kojima1, S. Anno2, K. Mandai3, H. Nagata4, M. Tada8, K. Inui5, S. Wakitani6, T. Koike7, H. Terai1
1Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
2Yodogawa Christian Hospital, Osaka, Japan
3Mikunioka Mandai Orthopedic Clinic, Osaka, Japan
4Izumi City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan
5Osaka Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital, Osaka, Japan
6Koryokai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
7Search Institute for Bone and Arthritis Disease (SINBAD), Wakayama, Japan
8Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan

Background: The 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) addressed several recommendations regarding bDMARDs. Among these, recommendation 10 suggest if a bDMARD or targeted synthetic (ts) DMARD has failed, treatment with another bDMARD or a tsDMARD should be considered. However, there is currently insufficient evidence regarding the efficacy of switching to other target therapies when IL-6 inhibitors are ineffective.


Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of switching from IL-6 inhibitors used as first-line therapy to other targeted molecular therapies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.


Methods: We utilized a database of over 1,600 patients treated with targeted molecular therapies at Osaka Metropolitan University. Patients who initiated Phase 2 therapy with IL-6 inhibitors as their first-line bDMARD and transitioned to Phase 3 therapy were included. Retention rates at 52 weeks and changes in clinical disease activity index (CDAI) were analyzed for each targeted therapy category used in Phase 3.


Results: The 52 weeks retention rates after switching from IL-6 inhibitors were as follows:

  • TNF inhibitors: 91.7% (11/12).

  • IL-6 inhibitors: 16.7% (1/6) (p<0.01, vs TNF inhibitors).

  • CTLA4-Ig: 75.0% (3/4) (p=0.383, vs TNF inhibitors).

  • JAK inhibitors: 37.5% (3/8) (p<0.01, vs TNF inhibitors).

  • Among patients who completed 52 weeks of treatment, the mean CDAI decreased as follows:

  • TNF inhibitors: 18.7 to 7.7.

  • IL-6 inhibitors: 22.4 to 22.3.

  • CTLA4-Ig: 20.0 to 9.9.

  • JAK inhibitors: 26.5 to 12.2.

  • Retention rates and efficacy were higher with TNF inhibitors and CTLA4-Ig, while IL-6 inhibitors and JAK inhibitors showed lower retention rates and less favorable CDAI improvement. Switching to other IL-6 inhibitors or JAK inhibitors showed lower efficacy and retention rates, potentially due to shared pathways targeting IL-6. This suggests that switching to agents with different mechanisms of action, such as TNF inhibitors or CTLA4-Ig, may be more effective in patients with inadequate response to IL-6 inhibitors.

    52 weeks retention rates after switching from IL-6 inhibitors.

    mean CDAI change during 52weeks.


    Conclusion: When switching from IL-6 inhibitors, consideration should be given to transitioning to targeted therapies with distinct mechanisms of action. TNF inhibitors and CTLA4-Ig demonstrated superior retention rates and efficacy, while JAK inhibitors may have limited benefit in such cases. TNF inhibitors or CTLA4-Ig should be preferentially considered in patients who fail IL-6 inhibitors.


    REFERENCES: [1] Tony HP, Feist E, Aries PM, et al. Rheumatol Adv Pract, 2022;6:rkac002. Sarilumab reduces disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to janus kinase inhibitors or tocilizumab in regular care in Germany.


    Acknowledgements: NIL.


    Disclosure of Interests: Tadashi Okano Abbvie, Tanabe Mitsubishi, Asahikasei, Janssen, Novartis, UCB, Eli Lilly, Astellas, Eisai, Kenji Mamoto: None declared, Yutaro Yamada: None declared, Takahito Kojima: None declared, Shohei Anno: None declared, Koji Mandai: None declared, Hiroyuki Nagata: None declared, Masahiro Tada: None declared, Kentaro Inui: None declared, Shigeyuki Wakitani: None declared, Tatsuya Koike: None declared, Hidetomi Terai: None declared.

    © The Authors 2025. This abstract is an open access article published in Annals of Rheumatic Diseases under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ). Neither EULAR nor the publisher make any representation as to the accuracy of the content. The authors are solely responsible for the content in their abstract including accuracy of the facts, statements, results, conclusion, citing resources etc.


    DOI: annrheumdis-2025-eular.B2974
    Keywords: Observational studies/ registry, Biological DMARD
    Citation: , volume 84, supplement 1, year 2025, page 346
    Session: Clinical Poster Tours: Difficult to treat Rheumatoid Arthritis (Poster Tours)